Clinical triage concordance of a point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay using the ESC 0/1-hour algorithm
In brief
Point-of-care troponin matched lab triage in 90% of emergency patients
In 127 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, point-of-care troponin testing placed 90% in the same 0/1-hour triage category as lab testing. All mismatches were between neighboring categories, and no patient classed as rule-in by the lab was classed as rule-out at the bedside; routine-care performance still needs prospective evaluation.
- Journal
- Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry (Q1)
- Published
- 23 October 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Narisorn Kongruttanachok, Naphat Chaijirawiwat, M T Angkana Chirapanuruk, Tanawat Tarapan
- PMID
- 42918591
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.cca.2026.122902
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Biochemistry (medical) (top studies of the week, 25 October 2026): Prospective comparison of point-of-care and laboratory troponin assays
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays have demonstrated good analytical agreement with central laboratory (CL) testing, it remains uncertain whether they yield the same clinical triage decisions. We evaluated the clinical concordance of a POC hs-cTnI assay with a CL assay using the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-h algorithm. METHODS: This prospective diagnostic agreement study included 127 patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome. The primary outcome was concordance of patient classification according to the 0/1-h algorithm, assessed using the quadratic weighted kappa (κ) statistic. Secondary outcomes included quantitative agreement assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis, and analytical comparability between whole blood and plasma on the POC platform. RESULTS: Overall, 114/127 patients (89.8%) were assigned to the same triage category (κ = 0.921; 95% CI, 0.878-0.964). All 13 discordant classifications (10.2%) occurred between adjacent categories, with no CL rule-in patient classified as POC rule-out. Quantitative agreement between assays was good (ICC = 0.882; 95%CI 0.835-0.917), with a mean bias of -5.27 ng/L. Whole blood and plasma showed close agreement (ICC = 0.999; 95%CI 0.998-0.999), with a mean bias of 0.50 ng/L. CONCLUSIONS: The POC assay showed high clinical concordance with CL-based ESC 0/1-h triage classification, with all discordances confined to adjacent categories. These findings provide pre-implementation evidence supporting further prospective evaluation of POC hs-cTnI testing under routine bedside conditions.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.