Skip to main content

Association of ambient artificial intelligence scribe availability with patient instruction documentation and readability in ambulatory care

Journal
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA (Q1)
Published
22 October 2026
Study design
Retrospective cohort
Evidence level
Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
Authors
Kevin Shi, Megan Creasman, Gabriela Schmajuk, Aris Oates, Maria E Byron, Augusto Garcia-Agundez, et al.
PMID
42914097
DOI
10.1093/jamia/ocag177

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Health Informatics (top studies of the week, 25 October 2026): Evaluates AI scribe effects on documentation workflow and patient instructions

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the effect of an artificial intelligence (AI) scribe on patient instructions documentation in ambulatory internal medicine settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 391 061 adult encounters at a single medical center from December 2023 to July 2025. A difference-in-differences analysis estimated the relationship of AI scribe availability with patient instructions documentation frequency. Mixed-effects logistic regression estimated the association between encounter-level AI scribe utilization and documentation, adjusted for patient, clinician, and encounter characteristics. Length and readability were compared across instructions created by AI alone, clinicians assisted by AI, and clinicians alone. Character-level edit distances between AI drafts and final documentation were calculated. RESULTS: AI scribe availability was associated with a 10.5 percentage-point increase in patient instructions documentation frequency (P = .018), and encounter-level AI use was associated with higher odds of documentation (aOR 4.32; 95% CI, 4.14-4.50). AI instructions were longer than clinician-authored content (median 1994 vs 482 characters) and scored higher on 3 text-complexity indices (all P < .001). Clinician editing of AI content increased length without meaningfully reducing complexity. AI drafts and final documentation differed substantially, with a median character-level edit distance of 39.7%. DISCUSSION: AI scribe availability was associated with increased patient instructions documentation. However, AI-generated instructions were longer and scored as more linguistically complex than clinician-authored instructions, and clinician editing did not close this gap. CONCLUSION: Ambient AI scribes can improve availability but may increase complexity of patient instructions. Research into downstream effects including patient comprehension and satisfaction is warranted.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.