Skip to main content

Diagnostic Performance of the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema Score for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome-Post Hoc Analysis of the "Validating Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers for Diagnosis" Study

In brief

A lung-edema X-ray score detected ARDS with 85% sensitivity and 83% specificity

In 236 invasively ventilated ICU patients, a radiographic lung-edema score of 20 or higher identified acute respiratory distress syndrome with 85% sensitivity and 83% specificity; scores also showed strong agreement between experienced raters. This post hoc analysis at one medical center supports the score as a standardized diagnostic aid, but its performance needs testing in other settings.

Journal
Critical care explorations (Q1)
Published
21 October 2026
Study design
Prospective / inception cohort
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
Authors
Claudio Zimatore, Matthieu Jabaudon, Luigi Pisani, Tatsuki Koyama, Marcus J Schultz, Lorraine B Ware
PMID
42902574
DOI
10.1097/CCE.0000000000001495

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Edema (RALE) score for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and its interobserver reliability. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: ICUs at Vanderbilt University Medical Center participating in the Validating Acute Lung Injury Biomarkers for Diagnosis study. PATIENTS: Adult patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least two consecutive days, with chest radiographs available on the first 2 ICU days. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Chest radiographs from the first 2 ICU days were scored independently by at least two experienced raters; scores were averaged per radiograph, and the highest averaged score from ICU day 1 or 2 was selected for analysis. The primary outcome was ARDS according to the Berlin definition during the first 2 ICU days. Of 236 patients, 92 (39%) had ARDS. The median RALE score was higher in patients with ARDS than in those without (29.5 [22.2-34.5] vs. 12.2 [7.5-17.8]; p < 0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96). At the optimal cutoff of 20, sensitivity was 85%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 76%, and negative predictive value 90%. Interobserver reliability was high, with pairwise intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: In patients invasively ventilated for at least 2 days, the RALE score demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for ARDS at a cutoff of 20, together with high interobserver reliability, supporting its potential role as a standardized radiographic tool in the diagnosis of ARDS.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.