Skip to main content

Angiographic prevalence of occlusion myocardial infarction and the limited value of serial troponin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

In brief

Serial troponin poorly distinguished occlusion, found in one in five catheterized patients

In this single-center retrospective cohort, 98 of 481 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome who underwent catheterization met the angiographic definition of culprit-artery occlusion. None of seven troponin measures reliably distinguished occlusion; even the best, the 6-hour value, had only modest accuracy and a 27% positive predictive value, underscoring the need to study complementary approaches such as expert ECG interpretation.

Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (Q1)
Published
5 October 2026
Study design
Retrospective cohort
Evidence level
Level 4, Very Low (CEBM 4)
Authors
Sajid Kadir, Sandeep Sasidharan, Sandipan Shringi, Mahati Dasari, Pramukh Arun Kumar
PMID
42898203
DOI
10.3389/fcvm.2026.1903711

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Emergency Medicine (paper of the day, 22 October 2026): Serial troponin limitations for identifying acute coronary occlusion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An estimated 25%-34% of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are diagnosed with an occluded culprit artery during catheterization. Whether early serial troponin kinetics discriminate angiographically defined occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) in catheterized patients with NSTE-ACS remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 481 patients with NSTE-ACS who underwent coronary catheterization between 2017 and 2023. OMI was defined by a purely angiographic criterion: >90% culprit-vessel stenosis with Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade 0, 1, or 2. Seven contemporary sensitivity troponin I metrics (absolute values at 0, 3, and 6 h; deltas; and ratios) were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Operating characteristics are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (20.4%) met the angiographic definition of OMI. These patients were younger (median, 65.5 vs. 70.0 years; p = 0.025), had fewer comorbidities, and more often presented with chest pain (92.9% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.013). The left circumflex artery was the most common culprit in OMI (36.7%). Twenty-nine patients with OMI (29.6%) had a presentation ECG classified as normal (no ST-T change or bundle branch block. No troponin metric reliably discriminated OMI from non-occlusion MI. The prespecified primary predictor, the 0-6-h change in troponin concentration, had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.623 (95% CI, 0.544-0.703) and the best single metric, the 6-h value, of 0.654 (0.580-0.727); all seven unadjusted troponin-metric AUCs were under 0.66. At its Youden cutoff (≥0.379 ng/mL), the 6-h troponin had a sensitivity of 69.4%, a specificity of 57.7%, a positive predictive value of 27.2%, and a negative predictive value of 89.3%. The highest positive predictive value of any metric was 41.3%, the first troponin (at 0 h) identified fewer than 40% of patients with OMI at its optimal threshold, and likelihood ratios produced only limited shifts in post-test probability. CONCLUSION: Among analyzable patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing catheterization, approximately one in five met the study-defined angiographic criteria for OMI. Early serial troponin kinetics showed only modest discrimination, and upper confidence bounds fell below levels expected of a standalone triage biomarker. Complementary strategies for identifying these patients, including expert ECG interpretation, warrant further study.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.