Skip to main content

Individualized Cardiac Index-Guided Hemodynamic Therapy in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Major Abdominal Surgery: The PELICAN Randomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Cardiac index-guided therapy did not reduce complications after major abdominal surgery

In this randomized trial of 1,095 high-risk patients, the composite of kidney or heart injury, severe infection, cardiac arrest, or death occurred in 44% with individualized cardiac index-guided therapy and 47% with routine care, with no clear difference. None of the individual complications differed between groups, so targeting each patient's preoperative cardiac index did not improve early postoperative outcomes.

Journal
JAMA (Q1)
Published
19 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Bernd Saugel, Agnes S Meidert, Christian S Meyhoff, Rune Sort, Eske K Aasvang, Alina Bergholz, et al.
PMID
42896534
DOI
10.1001/jama.2026.18574

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Surgery (top studies of the week, 1 November 2026): Cardiac index‑guided hemodynamic therapy in high‑risk abdominal surgery

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: It remains unclear if intraoperative hemodynamic therapy should be guided by cardiac index. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy vs routine hemodynamic therapy improves outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, single-blind, superiority randomized clinical trial enrolled high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery between October 8, 2023, and October 25, 2025, at 12 university medical centers in Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, and Spain. The date of last follow-up was January 15, 2026. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy targeting the patient's preoperative resting cardiac index vs routine hemodynamic therapy (with blinded cardiac index monitoring). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days. RESULTS: Of the 1128 patients enrolled, 1111 were randomized and 1095 were included in the primary analysis (median age, 67 years [IQR, 59-74 years]; 49.4% were female). The primary outcome occurred in 243 of 549 patients (44.3%) in the individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy group vs 256 of 546 patients (46.9%) in the routine hemodynamic therapy group (relative risk, 0.94 [95.1% CI, 0.83-1.08]; P = .38). There were no between-group differences for the incidence of the individual components of the primary outcome within the first 7 postoperative days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among high-risk patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, individualized cardiac index-guided hemodynamic therapy targeting the patient's preoperative resting cardiac index did not reduce the incidence of a composite outcome of acute kidney injury, acute myocardial injury, severe infectious complications, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or death within the first 7 postoperative days compared with routine hemodynamic therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05648279.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.