Effects of minocycline on health-related quality of life in patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China: a prespecified secondary analysis of the EMPHASIS trial
In brief
Minocycline group had 73% favorable health status after stroke, versus 69%
In a prespecified analysis of 1,697 trial participants in China, 73.4% of patients given minocycline reached a favorable health state at 90 days, compared with 68.9% given placebo. The main quality-of-life score did not differ significantly between groups in the primary analysis, and the visual rating was also similar; the modest gains need confirmation.
- Journal
- EClinicalMedicine (Q1)
- Published
- 22 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Qianqian Yang, Ying Li, Luyan Wang, Tingfang Ai, Yao Lu, Meiyang Zhang, et al.
- PMID
- 42892901
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104239
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Neurology (clinical) (paper of the day, 22 October 2026): RCT of minocycline in acute ischemic stroke
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is increasingly recognised as a critical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). Minocycline may have neuroprotective potential in AIS; however, its effects on patient-reported HRQoL remain uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of minocycline on HRQoL at 90 days. METHODS: This prespecified secondary analysis was based on data from the EMPHASIS trial, a parallel randomised controlled trial of minocycline in AIS at 58 centres in China from May 19, 2023, to May 20, 2024. Eligible participants were aged 18-80 years, were enrolled within 72 h of acute ischaemic stroke onset and had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 4-25, and a pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale score of 1 or less. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive minocycline or placebo plus standard care. HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQol five-dimension three-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) at 90 days. The primary outcome was EQ-5D-3L utility score; secondary outcomes were EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), a favourable health state defined as EQ-5D-3L utility score ≥0.75, and EQ-5D-3L domain responses. Primary analyses were conducted in the prespecified modified intention-to-treat population using linear, log-binomial, and ordinal logistic models for continuous, binary, and ordinal outcomes. Multivariable-adjusted and per-protocol sensitivity analyses were also performed. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05836740). FINDINGS: Of 1724 participants, 1697 were included in the final analyses. The primary analysis showed no significant between-group difference in EQ-5D-3L utility score (p = 0.224). After multivariable adjustment, the EQ-5D-3L utility score was higher in minocycline group than in placebo group (p = 0.049). The proportion of patients achieving a favourable health state was higher in the minocycline group than in the placebo group (73.4% vs 68.9%; risk ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.003-1.13; p = 0.039), with improvements in mobility (p = 0.043), self-care (p = 0.030), and usual activities (p = 0.031). EQ-VAS did not differ significantly between two groups (p = 0.420). INTERPRETATION: Minocycline may improve health state and EQ-5D-3L domains at 90 days, supporting further evaluation as adjunctive therapy and incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into stroke trials. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, The National Key Research and Development Program of China, Beijing Health Union Cardio-cerebrovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment Foundation, Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project, New Cornerstone Science Foundation, Beijing Scholar Program, Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission, and Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.