Clinical Decision Support for Fall Prevention in Primary Care: The eSTEPS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
In brief
EHR fall-prevention support cut coded falls by 9% in older adults
In this cluster randomized trial, older primary care patients at practices using the electronic decision support had 19.3 coded falls per 100 patient-years, compared with 21.2 at control practices; fall-related injuries were also modestly lower. Exercise prescriptions reached 22.1% of intervention patients, and mortality did not differ, leaving questions about uptake and effects on outcomes beyond coded events.
- Journal
- JAMA network open (Q1)
- Published
- 1 October 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Nancy K Latham, Erin Hommel, Mackenzie Kiesman, Stuart R Lipsitz, David W Bates, Diane L Carroll, et al.
- PMID
- 42886484
- DOI
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.39240
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Family Practice (paper of the day, 17 October 2026): eSTEPS fall‑prevention decision support trial in older adults
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Falls are a leading cause of injury among older adults. Although exercise reduces fall risk, implementation in primary care remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support intervention, Electronic Strategies for Tailored Exercise to Prevent Falls (eSTEPS), reduces falls among older primary care patients at increased risk. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This matched-pair cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 9, 2023, to May 8, 2025, with 12 to 23 months of follow-up at primary care practices within an integrated health system in the US. Adults aged 65 years or older with a positive 3-item fall-risk screen at a primary care visit were included. INTERVENTION: eSTEPS decision support embedded in the electronic health record with tailored exercise recommendations, optional physical therapy referral, and patient-facing materials (handouts, website, and app). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of patients with 1 or more falls identified using electronic health record-derived International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes. Secondary outcomes were the rate of patients with 1 or more fall-related injuries identified by validated ICD-10 algorithms and mortality. RESULTS: Among 11 945 participants (mean [SD] age, 77.05 [7.43] years; 8044 females [67.3%]), of whom 5681 (47.6%) were in the intervention group and 6264 (52.4%) were in the control group, at 22 primary care practices, the rate of 1 or more ICD-10-coded falls (including falls with injuries) per 100 patient-years over the study period was 19.3 (95% CI, 18.6-20.1) in patients from intervention practices vs 21.2 (95% CI, 20.2-22.1) in patients from control practices (rate ratio [RR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.88-0.95]; P < .001). The rate of ICD-10-coded fall-related injuries per 100 patient-years was 15.7 (95% CI, 15.0-16.5) from intervention practices vs 16.7 (95% CI, 16.1-17.4) from control practices over the study period (RR for fall injuries per 100 patient-years, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.90-0.97]; P = .001). No differences were observed in mortality. For intervention patients, eSTEPS exercise prescriptions were issued for 1255 patients (22.1%). Overall, 215 clinicians (77.9%) in intervention practices used the clinical decision support to deliver the exercise program at least once over the study period. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cluster randomized clinical trial of an electronic health record-integrated decision support, falls and fall-related injuries were modestly reduced in older adults in primary care. These results suggest support for scalable, workflow-integrated fall prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04993781.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.