Skip to main content

Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Before Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Preoperative radiation was followed by 71% one-year recurrence-free survival in kidney cancer trial

In this single-center phase 2 trial, 21 patients with kidney cancer and a large-vessel tumor clot were assessed after radiation followed by surgery; 71% were recurrence-free at one year, above the 55.7% historical surgery-alone benchmark. No one died within 90 days of surgery, but four patients had grade 4 treatment-related events. The nonrandomized result needs confirmation against a concurrent comparison group.

Journal
JAMA oncology (Q1)
Published
15 October 2026
Study design
Phase 2 randomized trial (exploratory)
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
Authors
Raquibul Hannan, Lin Lin, Ryan Assadi, Laurentiu M Pop, Lily Robles, Faya Zhang, et al.
PMID
42879162
DOI
10.1001/jamaoncol.2026.4172

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Surgical Oncology (paper of the day, 16 October 2026): Phase 2 nonrandomized trial of neoadjuvant SABR before IVC thrombectomy

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus is associated with substantial perioperative risk and frequent recurrence despite nephrectomy and thrombectomy. No established neoadjuvant local therapy exists for this high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, clinical outcomes, and exploratory biomarker effects of neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) targeting IVC tumor thrombus before nephrectomy and thrombectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center prospective phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients with newly diagnosed RCC and Mayo level II to IV IVC tumor thrombus eligible for neoadjuvant SABR and definitive surgery from July 2015 to January 2024. Data were analyzed from August 2025 to August 2026. INTERVENTION: Neoadjuvant SABR to the radiographically defined IVC tumor thrombus, delivered as 40 Gy in 5 fractions or 36 Gy in 3 fractions, followed by radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with a prespecified historical surgery-alone benchmark of 55.7%. Secondary outcomes included 90-day perioperative morbidity and mortality, adverse events, pulmonary embolism, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival. Exploratory analyses included Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA. RESULTS: Of 23 patients who received neoadjuvant SABR, 22 completed surgery, and 21 were included in the primary RFS analysis. Of 21 included patients, 12 (57%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 62.5 (54.0-73.2) years. A total of 19 patients had clear-cell RCC; all tumors were grade 3 or 4, and 3 patients had metastatic disease at enrollment. At a median (range) follow-up of 108.6 (2.0-127.2) months, 1-year RFS was 71.4% (80% CI, 56.6-82.0; 95% CI, 47.2-86.0), meeting the prespecified phase 2 screening criterion based on comparison with the historical surgery-alone benchmark of 55.7% (P = .09). One-year overall survival was 95.2% (80% CI, 83.9-98.7; 95% CI, 70.7-99.3) and cancer-specific survival was 95.2% (80% CI, 83.9-98.7; 95% CI, 70.7-99.3). No 90-day perioperative mortality occurred; 4 grade 4 treatment-attributed events occurred, but no grade 4/5 radiation-attributed toxic effects occurred. Ki-67 expression was reduced in patients with irradiated tumor thrombus compared with nonirradiated controls. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA was detected in all patients with available plasma and declined after treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this nonrandomized clinical trial, neoadjuvant SABR before nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy appeared feasible with an acceptable safety profile. RFS met the prespecified phase 2 screening criterion but remains exploratory and warrants further evaluation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02473536.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.