Skip to main content

Monoclonal Antibodies for the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Infants and Children: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Journal
Drugs (Q1)
Published
15 October 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Jing Xiong, Chunyang Bai, Mingyao Sun, Janne Estill, Caixia An, Long Ge
PMID
42879082
DOI
10.1007/s40265-026-02395-x

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (top studies of the week, 18 October 2026): Monoclonal antibodies for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus in

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Motivated by the emergence of a long-acting monoclonal antibody (clesrovimab), the availability of data from the complete MELODY trial cohort, and results from a large randomized trial (HARMONIE), we updated our prior network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies for preventing severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy and safety of RSV infection prophylaxis with clesrovimab, motavizumab, nirsevimab, palivizumab, and suptavumab versus one another or placebo or no prophylaxis in infants. We performed a frequentist framework random-effects network meta-analysis and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Eighteen trials enrolling 33,283 infants were included. Clesrovimab (odds ratio [OR] 0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.37, moderate certainty), motavizumab (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.07-0.19, moderate certainty), and nirsevimab (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.11-0.34; moderate certainty) were associated with reductions in the rate of severe respiratory syncytial virus infection. Nirsevimab, motavizumab, clesrovimab, and intramuscular palivizumab were associated with reductions in RSV infection, and several agents were also associated with reduced hospitalization. Motavizumab and nirsevimab, and clesrovimab were associated with reductions in broader lower respiratory tract infection-related outcomes. Motavizumab reduced both mechanical ventilation use and intensive care unit admission. No significant differences were found in all-cause mortality and drug-related or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: This updated network meta-analysis confirmed that the effectiveness and safety of clesrovimab were comparable to those of established monoclonal antibodies. Motavizumab, nirsevimab, and clesrovimab showed benefits for broader lower respiratory tract infection-related outcomes.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.