Skip to main content

Effectiveness of rTMS vs. Pharmacotherapy in Late-Life Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Observational Study of Individual Participant Data From Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Journal
The American journal of psychiatry (Q1)
Published
14 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Erin Adler, Daniel M Blumberger, Eric J Lenze, Patrick J Brown, Jordan F Karp, Helen Lavretsky, et al.
PMID
42870348
DOI
10.1176/appi.ajp.20260398

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Psychiatry and Mental Health (paper of the day, 17 October 2026): rTMS versus pharmacotherapy for late‑life treatment‑resistant depression

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the effectiveness and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) versus pharmacotherapy augmentation and switching strategies in older adults with late-life treatment-resistant depression (LL-TRD). METHODS: This observational study used individual participant data from 758 participants age 60 or older with LL-TRD from two randomized controlled trials: an rTMS trial of once-daily bilateral treatment for 4-6 weeks, and a pharmacotherapy trial comparing aripiprazole augmentation, bupropion augmentation, and switch to bupropion. Restriction, propensity score weighting, and regression adjustment were used to account for differences in trial design and eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) 10 weeks after treatment initiation. RESULTS: After accounting for differences in participant characteristics, rTMS was associated with lower MADRS scores than aripiprazole augmentation (difference: 4.16 points, 95% CI=2.32, 6.00), bupropion augmentation (difference: 6.08 points, 95% CI=4.06, 8.09), and switch to bupropion (difference: 6.36 points, 95% CI=4.55, 8.17). rTMS was also associated with a higher response rate (defined as reduction ≥50% in MADRS score from baseline to week 10) than aripiprazole augmentation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=3.83, 95% CI=1.08, 13.56), bupropion augmentation (AOR=4.87, 95% CI=1.15, 20.68), and switch to bupropion (AOR=4.02, 95% CI=1.12, 14.47). Participants who received rTMS were significantly more likely to experience headache than those who received pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that rTMS for LL-TRD may be superior to pharmacotherapy and supports the use of rTMS earlier in the treatment algorithms for LL-TRD.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.