Skip to main content

Concealed right upper lobe pulmonary venous variants on 3D-CTBA: morphological characterization and surgical implications

Journal
Frontiers in medicine (Q1)
Published
28 September 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Luoyu Lian, Xin Luo, Dongliang Lin, Weiqing Zhang, Jinlong Huang, Shuchen Chen
PMID
42865564
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1964027

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Anatomy (top studies of the week, 18 October 2026): Concealed pulmonary venous variants via 3D‑CTBA

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The surgical anatomy of the right upper lobe pulmonary vein is variable and rare anomalies often go unnoticed in the first intraoperative exposure. METHODS: 3D-CTBA reconstructions were performed on 307 right-sided contrast-enhanced chest CT data with full segmentation of the arterial, venous and bronchial systems. RESULTS: Anomalous right upper lobe vein anatomy was detected in 23 cases (7.49%) consisting of 18 right top pulmonary veins (RTPVs) and 5 cases of proposed cranially displaced central vein (CDCV). In all 18 RTPVs, a single venous trunk collecting S2 drainage followed a retrobronchial course posterior to the right main bronchus or bronchus intermedius. Thirteen drained directly into left atrium. The other five had translobar confluence with the inferior pulmonary vein system; one drained first into V6 before joining the inferior pulmonary vein. Surgically relevant arterial anomalies were concentrated in the RTPV subgroup. A central vein configuration was also identified, in which the venous trunk coursed in the interval between B1 and the adjacent roots of B2 and B3, consistently more cranial than expected. This pattern is called the cranially displaced central vein (CDCV). DISCUSSION: Recognizing these precise anatomical configurations via preoperative 3D-CTBA is essential to avoid unexpected intraoperative hemorrhage during thoracic procedures.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.