Skip to main content

Real-World Overall Survival With Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide in Patients With Chemotherapy-Naïve Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer From the Flatiron Electronic Health Records Database

Journal
Cancer medicine (Q1)
Published
1 October 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Daniel J George, Jasmina I Ivanova, Maëlys Touya, Betty Thompson, Jonathan Assayag, Benjamin Li, et al.
PMID
42864777
DOI
10.1002/cam4.72356

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Urology (paper of the day, 18 October 2026): Abiraterone associated with shorter overall survival

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with chemotherapy- and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI)-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have generally shown worse overall survival (OS) with abiraterone versus enzalutamide in claims database studies. Given limitations of claims data, analysis using detailed electronic health records (EHRs) is needed to confirm this finding. METHODS: This EHR-based analysis (2014-2023) of the Flatiron Health database included patients with chemotherapy- and ARPI-naïve mCRPC who initiated first-line ARPI (abiraterone or enzalutamide). OS, treatment duration, and time to subsequent therapy were assessed. A subgroup analysis evaluated patients who received first-line ARPI only with no subsequent treatments. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated time-to-event outcomes. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) adjusted for baseline differences. RESULTS: Among 2731 patients, 1316 received first-line abiraterone and 1415 enzalutamide (median follow-up: 21.8 and 23.2 months, respectively). sIPTW-adjusted median OS (24.6 vs. 25.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.23), treatment duration (7.9 vs. 9.5 months; HR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.31), and time to subsequent therapy (14.7 vs. 17.9 months; HR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.32) were shorter with abiraterone versus enzalutamide. Among the 40% with no subsequent treatment (n = 1102), sIPTW-adjusted median OS (14.0 vs. 17.7 months; HR 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.53), and treatment duration (7.5 vs. 10.6 months; HR 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.50) were also shorter with abiraterone versus enzalutamide. CONCLUSIONS: Using more detailed data abstraction, these results confirm prior claims-based analyses showing that despite early use of subsequent therapy, first-line abiraterone is associated with shorter OS versus enzalutamide in ARPI- and chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial ID: NCT05968599.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.