Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Clinical Decision Support for Postoperative Delirium Prevention: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

In brief

AI decision support did not improve prevention practices in 7,294 surgical patients

Among patients identified with cognitive impairment before surgery, the electronic health record intervention did not significantly improve anesthesia teams' adherence to best practices or reduce delirium among those assessed. But only 17% had documented delirium assessments, and 34% of that group developed delirium, limiting conclusions about whether the tool can prevent it; better routine screening is needed to evaluate its effect.

Journal
Anesthesia and analgesia (Q1)
Published
9 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Danielle Scharp, Kerry Meyers, Girish Nadkarni, Alex Federman, Catherine Sarkisian, Matthew A Levin, et al.
PMID
42854247
DOI
10.1213/ANE.0000000000008318

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium affects up to 50% of older adults with cognitive impairment, yet preoperative identification of at-risk patients remains limited. Artificial intelligence methods, such as natural language processing, can extract cognitive impairment signals from electronic health records and enable targeted clinical decision support interventions to promote adherence to perioperative best practices and reduce postoperative delirium. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence-driven non-interruptive clinical decision support intervention in reducing postoperative delirium by promoting adherence to best practices among anesthesia teams caring for surgical patients with cognitive impairment. METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial embedded within routine clinical care at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City from June 20, 2023, to August 31, 2024, including patients with preoperative cognitive impairment identified immediately before surgery using a validated natural language processing algorithm, Mini-Mental State Examination scores, or diagnostic codes. Patients were randomized to an artificial intelligence-driven non-interruptive clinical decision support intervention within the electronic health record to promote adherence to best practices among anesthesia teams or routine perioperative care. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium, assessed with the 4 A's Test within seven days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were adherence to 12 perioperative best practices. We used chi-square tests for primary and secondary outcome analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 7294 patients were identified as having cognitive impairment immediately before surgery and were randomized to the intervention (n = 3624) or control (n = 3670) group. In total, 1255/7294 (17.2%) patients had documented postoperative delirium assessments, of whom 426/1255 (34%) developed this condition. Between intervention and control groups, there were no statistically significant differences in POD incidence (225/641, 35.1% vs 201/614, 32.7%, P = .37) or best practice adherence (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this pragmatic randomized controlled trial, less than 20% of the sample had documented delirium assessments due to variability in routine POD screening practices, limiting our ability to conclude that artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support was not effective in preventing postoperative delirium. However, based on our secondary outcome analyses, the intervention did not significantly change best practice adherence. Further work is needed to determine the best way to use these tools effectively.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.