Skip to main content

Effect of Deep Versus Moderate Neuromuscular Block on Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

In brief

Deep neuromuscular blockade cuts 3-month chronic pain after lumbar surgery by 16 points

In a randomized trial of 178 patients, chronic postsurgical pain at 3 months affected 19% with deep blockade versus 35% with moderate blockade. Deep blockade also reduced opioid use and muscle injury markers, but the pain difference was no longer significant at 6 months, leaving its longer-term benefit uncertain.

Journal
Anesthesia and analgesia (Q1)
Published
7 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Xinghe Wang, Jing Xia, Dong Huang, Jie Guo, Yan Wu, Tianyu Yin, et al.
PMID
42848950
DOI
10.1213/ANE.0000000000008324

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (paper of the day, 9 October 2026): DNMB vs MNMB effect on chronic postsurgical pain
  • Picked for Spine Surgery (paper of the day, 9 October 2026): RCT, deep vs moderate blockade reduces CPSP

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a debilitating complication following posterior lumbar surgery, often exacerbated by retraction-induced paraspinal muscle injury. While deep neuromuscular blockade (DNMB) optimizes surgical conditions, its ability to mitigate this mechanical injury and prevent pain chronification remains unproven. This trial investigated the effect of DNMB on the incidence of CPSP and its underlying biological mechanisms. METHODS: Participants scheduled for posterior lumbar interbody fusion were randomized to either the DNMB group or the moderate neuromuscular blockade (MNMB) group. The primary outcome was CPSP incidence at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of CPSP at 6 months, postoperative opioid consumption, acute muscle injury biomarkers (creatine kinase [CK], myoglobin [MYO], and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), and radiographic assessment of cross-sectional area (CSA) and fat infiltration (FI) of paraspinal muscles. RESULTS: Of 180 patients randomized, 178 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. At 3 months, the incidence of CPSP was significantly lower in the DNMB group (17/89 [19.1%]) compared with the MNMB group (31/89 [34.8%]) (risk ratio [RR], 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.9; P = .018). There was no significant difference in the incidence of CPSP at 6 months (13/89 [14.6%] vs 17/89 [19.1%]; RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4-1.5; P = .423). Furthermore, the DNMB group demonstrated lower postoperative pain scores, reduced opioid consumption, and higher surgeons' satisfaction scores (P < .05, P < .001, P < .001, respectively). This group also exhibited lower early postoperative serum concentrations of CK, MYO, and LDH (all P < .001 on postoperative day 1), alongside better preservation of CSA and less progression of FI on 6-month magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to MNMB, DNMB significantly reduced the 3-month incidence of CPSP and decreased opioid consumption in patients undergoing spinal surgery. These clinical benefits were associated with reduced acute muscle injury, as reflected by lower early injury biomarkers and better preservation of long-term paraspinal muscle structure.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.