Skip to main content

Circulating serotonin is associated with calcific aortic valve stenosis: a two-phase metabolomics study

In brief

Serotonin raised aortic stenosis model discrimination from 0.75 to 0.87

In an independent cohort of 303 people, blood serotonin was lower in those with aortic valve stenosis than in controls, but did not distinguish non-severe from severe disease. Adding serotonin to a clinical model increased its area under the curve from 0.752 to 0.865; its standalone performance was moderate, and prospective studies must establish whether it adds clinical value.

Journal
Frontiers in pharmacology (Q1)
Published
23 September 2026
Study design
Prospective / inception cohort
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
Authors
Wei Gao, Chenghu Guo, Nizal Sarrafzadegan, Haowei Zhang, Zeyuan Mei, Jiaqi Li, et al.
PMID
42846201
DOI
10.3389/fphar.2026.1934998

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Biochemistry (medical) (top studies of the week, 11 October 2026): Serum serotonin linked to calcific aortic stenosis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in the elderly, yet no pharmacological therapy can halt its progression, partly due to incomplete understanding of disease-associated metabolic alterations and the lack of circulating biomarkers for disease detection. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize metabolic alterations associated with CAVS and evaluate a candidate circulating marker for CAVS detection. METHODS: In the discovery cohort, patients with severe CAVS and matched controls without aortic valve disease were enrolled. Untargeted serum metabolomics was performed to characterize metabolic profiles. Differential metabolites, pathway enrichment analysis, and machine-learning-based feature prioritization were conducted. Based on pathway-level metabolic annotation, biological evidence, and feasibility of targeted measurement, serotonin was selected as a biologically prioritized, hypothesis-generating candidate and evaluated by ELISA in an independent targeted assessment cohort including controls, non-severe CAVS, and severe CAVS. Associations between serum serotonin levels and CAVS were assessed using multivariable logistic regression, smooth curve analysis, subgroup analyses, and ROC analysis. RESULTS: The discovery cohort included 58 participants [29 with severe CAVS (69.7 ± 7.5 years; 44.8% male) and 29 matched controls (66.8 ± 5.1 years; 58.6% male)]. Untargeted metabolomics identified 70 differential metabolites. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis revealed serotonin-related metabolic annotations, while Random Forest analysis prioritized indoleacrylic acid as a discriminatory metabolite feature. Serotonin was not selected based on individual metabolite ranking but was evaluated based on pathway-level evidence, biological plausibility, and feasibility of targeted measurement. In the independent targeted assessment cohort of 303 individuals (101 controls, 101 non-severe CAVS, and 101 severe CAVS), serum serotonin levels were significantly lower in both non-severe and severe CAVS groups compared with controls, but did not differ between disease severity groups. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounders confirmed its independent inverse association with CAVS. Incorporation of serum serotonin into the clinical model improved discrimination (AUC increased from 0.752 to 0.865), whereas serotonin alone showed moderate diagnostic performance. CONCLUSION: Reduced circulating serotonin is associated with the presence of CAVS and may represent a biologically plausible candidate adjunct biomarker for disease detection. Further multicenter prospective and mechanistic studies are required to determine its clinical utility and biological significance.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.