Effectiveness of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Non-Autologous Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Journal
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery (Q1)
- Published
- 6 October 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Chu Luan Nguyen, Ramandeep Kaur, Sze Ki Melanie Tam, Deepali Poels, Basilie Teoh, Jue Li Seah, et al.
- PMID
- 42842697
- DOI
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000013481
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (paper of the day, 8 October 2026).
- Picked for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (paper of the day, 8 October 2026): Closed‑incision NPWT reduces wound complications in non‑autologous breast surgery
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prophylactic closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) may reduce risk of postoperative wound complications, but its use in breast surgery remains uncertain due to lack of breast-specific recommendations in guidelines. This meta-analysis addresses this gap by evaluating the efficacy of ciNPWT versus standard dressings in non-autologous breast surgery. METHODS: A meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies comparing ciNPWT versus standard dressings in patients undergoing mastectomy, implant-based breast reconstruction, or mammoplasty was conducted following PRISMA (from inception to September 2025). Outcomes were total wound complications, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, necrosis, seroma, haematoma, re-operation, and implant loss. Risk of bias (RoB2, ROBINS-I) and certainty (GRADE) were assessed, and data pooled (RStudio). Registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251002005). RESULTS: Twenty studies (6 RCTs, 14 observational) involving 2287 patients (3376 breasts) were included. ciNPWT significantly reduced total wound complications (RR 0.56, 95%CI 0.42-0.74; p<0.0001; I²=71.9%; moderate certainty), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 14% (31.8% to 17.8%). Wound dehiscence (RR 0.48, 95%CI 0.29-0.79; p=0.0037; I²=33.4%) and necrosis (RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.48-0.94; p=0.0187; I²=7.5%) were also significantly reduced. Subgroup analyses suggested stronger effects in BMI ≥30 (RR 0.41 vs 0.61 for BMI <30) and with -125 mmHg settings (RR 0.46 vs 0.65 for -80 mmHg), though differences were not statistically significant (p>0.20). CONCLUSION: Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that ciNPWT reduces postoperative wound complications-particularly dehiscence and necrosis-with a clinically meaningful ARR of 14% for total wound complications. Refining patient selection and device configuration may further enhance its applicability.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.