Skip to main content

Complexity of coronary artery disease in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and multivessel disease: a substudy of the DanGer Shock trial

In brief

High coronary complexity tripled 180-day death odds in shock patients

In a secondary analysis of 256 patients with multivessel disease and infarct-related cardiogenic shock, a high coronary complexity score was linked to about three times the adjusted odds of death by 180 days compared with low or intermediate scores. Residual disease also predicted mortality, while complexity did not change the pump's effect; a possible benefit in 35 patients with an isolated left main blockage remains exploratory.

Journal
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology (Q1)
Published
5 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Jasmine M Marquard, Rasmus P Beske, Christian Hassager, Lisette O Jensen, Hans Eiskjær, Norman Mangner, et al.
PMID
42837204
DOI
10.4244/EIJ-D-26-00460

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of multivessel coronary anatomy and complexity in infarct-related cardiogenic shock (CS) is insufficiently characterised. AIMS: We sought to investigate the prognostic value of baseline and residual SYNTAX scores and their influence on the effect of microaxial flow pump (mAFP) support in multivessel disease (MVD) and infarct-related CS. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the DanGer Shock trial, MVD was defined as ≥1 non-culprit stenosis ≥70% or an isolated left main (LM) culprit lesion. Baseline SYNTAX scores were categorised as low (≤22), intermediate (23-32), or high (>32). Patients with an isolated LM culprit lesion were analysed separately. The primary outcome was 180-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 355 patients included in DanGer Shock, 256 patients had MVD; 211 had an available baseline SYNTAX score, with 26% of these in the low, 47% in the intermediate, and 27% in the high baseline SYNTAX groups. In all, 35 patients had an isolated LM culprit lesion. A high baseline SYNTAX score was associated with higher odds of 180-day all-cause mortality compared with low and intermediate baseline SYNTAX scores (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-8.69). A higher baseline SYNTAX score was associated with a higher residual SYNTAX score (p<0.001). The residual SYNTAX score independently predicted 180-day all-cause mortality. The mAFP effect was not modified by the baseline SYNTAX group (p for interaction=0.31). In patients with an isolated LM culprit lesion, mAFP use was associated with lower odds of 180-day all-cause mortality compared with standard care alone (adjusted OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.03-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline and residual SYNTAX scores independently predicted 180-day mortality. The mAFP effect was not modified by SYNTAX measures. In the isolated left main subgroup, a hypothesis-generating signal towards a clinical benefit with mAFP use was observed.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.