Alternative lengthening of telomeres in small well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: independent validation and cross-platform concordance
- Journal
- Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology (Q1)
- Published
- 6 October 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Ameya Patil, Raima Memon, Hallberra Gudmundsdottir, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Patricia Greipp, Sarah Jenkins, et al.
- PMID
- 42836995
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00428-026-04740-7
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Pathology and Forensic Medicine (paper of the day, 8 October 2026): ALT predicts progression in small PanNETs
Abstract
Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors measuring ≤ 2 cm (small PanNETs) are usually non-functional and most are discovered incidentally. While most are indolent, some behave aggressively and metastasize. Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) has shown promise as a predictive biomarker of recurrence in recent studies. We designed a multi-institutional study to validate the predictive ability of ALT in small PanNET to inform patient selection for operative versus non-operative management. We identified 172 cases of small PanNET diagnosed from 2001 to 2021 in four different institutions. ALT fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) could be performed in 133 cases and was compared with clinical outcomes. Among those with FISH, 44.4% were females with a mean age of 65.4 years (range 31-88). Twenty-one cases (15.8%) were ALT-positive. Over a median follow-up of 48 months, a total of 19 progressions (metastasis, recurrence, increase in size, or death) were recorded. ALT positivity was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival [PFS]. In the ALT-positive group, a total of 9 cases showed progression compared to 10 in the ALT-negative group (5-year PFS: 70.2% vs. 88.8%, hazard ratio: 4.69, p = 0.002). In a separate analysis using matched cases, ALT chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), demonstrated high concordance with ALT FISH (95.5% for positive and 91.7% for negative cases) enabling cross-platform validation. Unlike FISH, CISH can be interpreted using standard bright field microscopy, facilitating broader implementation. These findings support further evaluation of ALT testing, particularly via CISH, as a potentially scalable and accessible biomarker, while recognizing that formal analytic validation and confirmation in unselected cohorts are required before routine clinical implementation.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.