Skip to main content

Performance comparison and clinical validation of two rapid direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing approaches for pathogens isolated from positive blood cultures in children

Journal
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology (Q1)
Published
17 September 2026
Study design
Unclassified
Evidence level
Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
Authors
Fen Pan, Fangyuan Yu, Tiandong Zhang, Qin Cai, Jie Jiang, Hong Zhang, et al.
PMID
42823949
DOI
10.3389/fcimb.2026.1861487

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Rapid species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) are critical for timely and targeted therapy. This study evaluated the clinical performance of two rapid methods (HBL rapid method and rapid method with short-term culture) against the routine standard blood culture (BC) method. METHODS: A total of 162 monobacterial BC samples were enrolled. These samples were processed either using the HBL system (subcultured within 2 hours) or incubated on agar plates for short-term culture (6-8 hours). Subsequent species identification and AST were also performed. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), and error rates were calculated as compared to the conventional method. RESULTS: Among 162 isolates, Gram-negative bacteria comprised 66.7% (108/162) of the isolates, predominantly Enterobacteriales. Both the rapid methods demonstrated 100% species identification concordance with the standard BC method. In terms of AST, using the standard AST result as reference, the HBL rapid method yielded an EA of 95.6% and a CA of 98.3%, with minor error (mE), major error (ME), very major error (VME), and bias rates of 1.1%, 0.4%, 0.1%, and -2.3%, respectively. Similarly, the rapid method with short-term culture showed comparable efficacy (EA, 96.5%; CA, 98.8%; mE, 1.0%; ME, 0.2%; VME, 0.1%; bias, -0.3%). Crucially, the mean turnaround times (TATs) for the HBL rapid method (44.7 hours) and the rapid method with short-term culture (45.9 hours) were significantly shorter than the standard method (68.4 hours), representing an approximate 24-hour reduction in BC workflow. CONCLUSIONS: The two rapid methods exhibit exceptional accuracy and reliability for species identification and AST directly from positive blood cultures, which can significantly shorten the TAT for BSI diagnosis, offering clinicians to optimize timely and appropriate clinical treatment.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.