Ultrasound-guided hyomental distance versus weight-based method for ProSeal LMA™ size selection: A randomised controlled study
- Journal
- Indian journal of anaesthesia (Q2)
- Published
- 17 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Sangeeta Yadav, Rashmi Rani, Deepak Verma, Shayak Roy, Nang S Choupoo
- PMID
- 42820161
- DOI
- 10.4103/ija.ija_76_26
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Otorhinolaryngology (top studies of the week, 4 October 2026): Randomised controlled trial, airway device sizing
- Picked for Anatomy (top studies of the week, 4 October 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Conventional weight-based laryngeal mask airway (LMA) size selection does not consistently correlate with individual upper airway anatomy, leading to suboptimal device fit. Ultrasound-guided measurement of hyomental distance (HMD), an indicator of submandibular space, has emerged as a promising anatomy-based alternative. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided HMD-based sizing with conventional weight-based sizing of the ProSeal LMA™ (Teleflex Inc., Wayne, PA, USA) (PLMA) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: This prospective, double-blinded randomised controlled trial included 116 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II adults aged 18-60 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into two groups: Group A underwent PLMA size selection based on body weight, while Group B underwent ultrasound-guided HMD-based size selection. The primary outcome was first-attempt insertion success. Secondary outcomes included insertion time, number of attempts, need for reinsertion, and postoperative oral injury. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics were comparable between groups. First-attempt insertion success was similar in both groups (93.1% in weight-based group vs. 96.6% in HMD group; P = 0.67). The mean insertion time was comparable (18.1 ± 4.8 s vs. 18.5 ± 4.6 s; P = 0.60). The HMD group predominantly received smaller PLMA sizes (P < 0.001) without increased reinsertion rates or complications. Postoperative oral injury was rare and comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided HMD-based PLMA sizing provides an individualised, anatomy-based alternative to weight-based selection, achieving comparable insertion success, efficiency, and safety while favouring anatomically appropriate device sizing.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.