Robotic Training and Neural Reorganization in Stroke: A Systematic Review
- Journal
- F1000Research (Q2)
- Published
- 19 May 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Iyyappan Manickavasagam, Vignesh Srinivasan, Satheeskumar Durairaj, Animesh Hazari, Praveen Kumar Kanadakurti
- PMID
- 42817934
- DOI
- 10.12688/f1000research.180596.1
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Health Informatics (top studies of the week, 4 October 2026).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Stroke is a primary contributor to global adult morbidity, frequently resulting in debilitating gait disturbances that impede independence. While standard neurorehabilitation remains essential, the advent of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) provides a platform for high-intensity, reproducible interventions designed to stimulate neuroplasticity. This systematic review evaluated the literature from 2015 to 2025 to determine the influence of RAGT on neural reorganization and functional outcomes in stroke survivors. METHODOLOGY: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was performed for studies published between 2015 and 2025. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses investigating RAGT in acute, subacute, and chronic stroke patients. The evaluation metrics included clinical functional scales (e.g., the Berg Balance Scale and the 10-Meter Walk Test) and neurophysiological markers (e.g., fMRI, fNIRS, QEEG, and BDNF). RESULTS: Analysis of 23 randomized trials and multiple meta-analyses indicated that RAGT combined with conventional therapy yielded significant improvements in gait speed (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.47) and balance (mean difference [MD] = 4.58). Neuroimaging revealed increased activation of the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor areas. Electrophysiological data confirmed reductions in the Power Ratio Index, suggesting normalized cortical activity. End-effector systems have demonstrated superior efficacy in the subacute phase compared to exoskeletons. CONCLUSION: RAGT serves as a potent driver of cortical and spinal neuroplasticity by facilitating high-repetition task-specific stimuli. Early intervention during the subacute phase maximizes functional recovery. Future research should prioritize standardizing the dosing and longitudinal monitoring of neural connectivity. Trial Registration Status: Not Applicable.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.