Skip to main content

Pulse versus Nonpulse Corticosteroid Therapy in Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial (SAFER)

In brief

Pulse-dose steroids did not improve survival in acute pulmonary fibrosis flares

In a randomized trial of 100 adults with acute idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis exacerbations, 28-day mortality was 10.0% with pulse-dose steroids and 14.6% with a lower-dose regimen; 90-day mortality was 24.5% and 29.8%, respectively. Neither difference was statistically clear, and other outcomes were similar. The small trial leaves uncertainty about which regimen, if either, is better.

Journal
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (Q1)
Published
30 September 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Hyesoo Kim, Hye Jin Jang, Song Yee Kim, A La Woo, Eun Young Kim, Se Hyun Kwak, et al.
PMID
42813947
DOI
10.1093/ajrccm/aamag529

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

RATIONALE: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) has high short-term mortality, yet guidelines weakly recommend corticosteroids without defining dose or duration. Pulse-dose methylprednisolone is widely used despite minimal evidence. OBJECTIVES: To test the superiority of a pulse-dose corticosteroid regimen over a nonpulse regimen with respect to short-term survival in AE-IPF. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, multicenter trial at eight South Korean university hospitals, adults with AE-IPF were assigned (1:1) to receive either intravenous pulse methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg for 3 days) or nonpulse regimen (1 mg/kg for 7 days), followed by protocolised tapering and maintenance low-dose prednisolone. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality at 28 and 90 days. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit admission, use of mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, death or lung transplantation at 28 and 90 days, and adverse events. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04996303. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From July 2021 to April 2024, 100 patients were randomised (pulse n = 51; nonpulse n = 49). The pulse regimen did not demonstrate lower 28-day mortality than the nonpulse regimen (10.0% vs. 14.6%; risk difference, -4.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -18.8 to 9.1; P = 0.549) or lower 90-day mortality (24.5% vs. 29.8%; risk difference, -5.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -23.1 to 12.6; P = 0.648). Treating transplantation as a competing event, Fine-Gray analysis did not demonstrate a difference in 90-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were not demonstrably different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with AE-IPF, pulse-dose methylprednisolone did not demonstrate improved 28- or 90-day survival compared with a nonpulse corticosteroid regimen.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.