Skip to main content

Effectiveness, Mediators and Moderators of Remote Live vs. Pre-Recorded Physical Exercise Training for Chronic Low Back Pain

Journal
European journal of pain (London, England) (Q1)
Published
1 October 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Carlos Gevers-Montoro, Maxime Bergevin, Florian Bobeuf, Mylène Aubertin-Leheudre, Benjamin Pageaux, Mathieu Roy
PMID
42806217
DOI
10.1002/ejp.70388

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Family Practice (top studies of the week, 4 October 2026): Remote exercise equally effective for chronic low back pain

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remote physical exercise training offers a more accessible alternative for the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, the effectiveness of various remote delivery methods for this population is unclear. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial comparing live interactive training via videoconference to individual pre-recorded video training sessions in patients with CLBP. Ninety-four individuals with CLBP were randomly assigned to a waitlist or to a 12-week general exercise program delivered by a certified kinesiologist, either through live interactive or pre-recorded video sessions. The training intensity for the 3 weekly one-hour sessions was adapted to each participant's fitness level. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (average age 48.4 ± 12.5 years, 36 women) completed the study, with comparable rates of attrition in the three groups. Those performing exercise, irrespective of modality, experienced significant and clinically worthwhile (> 20%) reductions in pain intensity ratings compared to waitlist. Similarly, exercise training (vs. waitlist) decreased movement-evoked pain. No differences were observed between both forms of training for pain intensity, perceived difficulty, effort, fatigue, satisfaction or pain evoked during the training sessions. The therapeutic effects of physical exercise training were moderated by sex, with women reporting less pain relief, and mediated by improvements in self-perceived general health, increased levels of physical activity and greater gait speed (4-m gait task). CONCLUSIONS: Altogether, these results support that, independently of the mode of delivery (live vs. pre-recorded), remote exercise training is an accessible alternative to effectively alleviate CLBP. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Live and pre-recorded remote physical exercise training were equally effective in reducing pain intensity and movement-evoked pain. Across modalities, the clinical effects of remote exercise appeared to be mediated by increased engagement in physical activity, faster gait speed, and improvements in self-rated general health. Together, these findings suggest that exercise training may reduce pain by improving general health-related behaviours and beliefs.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.