Skip to main content

High- versus low-volume static stretching and eccentric exercise: a randomized controlled trial in older adults with hamstring tightness and possible sarcopenia

Journal
European journal of applied physiology (Q1)
Published
28 September 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Nongnuch Luangpon, Wirasinee Srijunto, Juntip Namsawang, Sirawee Chaovalit, Audrius Snieckus, Sarawut Lapmanee, et al.
PMID
42806072
DOI
10.1007/s00421-026-06446-9

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examined the effects of home-based high-volume static stretching on range of motion (ROM), musculotendinous unit (MTU) stiffness, muscle morphology, strength, balance, and physical function in older adults with hamstring tightness and possible sarcopenia. METHODS: Sixty-eight community-dwelling older adults (67.2 ± 4.5 years) were randomly assigned to high-volume static stretching (30 min/day), low-volume static stretching (3 min/day, 3 days/week), eccentric exercise (ECC), or non-intervention control (CON) for 6 weeks. Assessments conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up included muscle thickness (MT), ROM, MTU stiffness, isometric knee flexor strength, cross-education effects on contralateral strength, Y-Balance performance, and function outcomes. RESULTS: Significant group × time interaction effects were observed for ROM and isometric strength (p < 0.05). ROM increased after both stretching interventions (12.4° high-volume; 10.3° low-volume; d = 1.27-1.48), with no statistically detectable between-group difference. Isometric knee flexor strength improved after ECC (≈ 7.0 Nm; d = 1.53), with no contralateral strength transfer. No consistent intervention-related improvements were observed in MTU stiffness, muscle thickness, Y-Balance, or physical function. At the 3-month follow-up, knee flexor strength differed from baseline in the ECC group, although this was an uncontrolled follow-up observation. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically detectable difference in ROM was identified between high- and low-volume stretching. Exploratory analyses indicated that ECC improved strength more than control, whereas stretching-related changes remained below the minimal detectable change. . Low-volume stretching required substantially less weekly exercise time than high-volume stretching; however, equivalence was not established. Stretching and eccentric exercise may therefore produce distinct flexibility and strength adaptations in older adults. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20251222012).

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.