Skip to main content

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injection-to-Surgery Interval in Diabetic Vitrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In brief

Anti-VEGF before diabetic vitrectomy cuts early bleeding odds by 60%

In a review of 33 studies involving 3,419 eyes, anti-VEGF before surgery was associated with 60% lower odds of early postoperative bleeding, along with fewer reoperations. Bleeding rates were lowest when injection came 1 to 7 days before surgery, but interval comparisons were exploratory and do not establish an optimal window or prove the timing caused the difference.

Journal
Ophthalmology. Retina (Q1)
Published
28 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review of cohort studies
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2a)
Authors
Fahad R Butt, Salem Abu Al-Burak, Fatima Abid, Justin Shad, Korolos Sawires, BScPharm Marko M Popovic, et al.
PMID
42805587
DOI
10.1016/j.oret.2026.09.027

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Ophthalmology (paper of the day, 1 October 2026): Systematic review/meta‑analysis of anti‑VEGF timing in diabetic vitrectomy

Abstract

TOPIC: To evaluate how outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) vary with the preoperative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection-to-surgery interval. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Preoperative anti-VEGF facilitates vitrectomy in PDR, but the influence of the interval is unclear; longer intervals may increase fibrovascular contraction and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) risk. METHODS: This prospectively registered review (CRD420250651229) searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to March 17, 2026 for comparative studies of PPV for PDR with preoperative anti-VEGF. The prespecified confirmatory comparison was anti-VEGF versus no anti-VEGF, with early postoperative vitreous hemorrhage (VH) as the principal outcome; interval analyses (no anti-VEGF, 1 to 3, 4 to 7, 8 to 14, and more than 14 days) were exploratory. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using random-effects models (restricted maximum likelihood, Hartung-Knapp, prediction intervals) and sensitivity models for sparse events and clustered arms. Certainty of evidence was rated separately for the anti-VEGF effect and interval effects. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies (3,419 eyes; 12 randomized) were included. Anti-VEGF was associated with lower early postoperative VH (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.69), lower intraoperative VH (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.40), fewer reoperations (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.82), and less endodiathermy (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.43). Final visual acuity was slightly better but heterogeneous (MD, -0.15 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; 95% CI, -0.29 to 0.00). Late VH, retinal detachment, silicone oil use, and TRD did not differ. Single-group proportions were lowest at 1 to 3 and 4 to 7 days, but the interval modeled continuously was not associated with either hemorrhage outcome. Certainty was moderate for early postoperative VH and low to very low otherwise. CONCLUSION: Preoperative anti-VEGF is associated with less intraoperative and early postoperative hemorrhage and fewer reoperations at diabetic vitrectomy, with the lowest hemorrhage rates when injection precedes surgery by 1 to 7 days. The evidence does not identify a precise optimal interval; higher TRD and reoperation rates beyond 14 days derive from a single cohort. Interval associations are hypothesis-generating given observational, low-certainty evidence.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.