Effect of Intraoperative Ice Pack Application on Postoperative Pain, Edema, and Ecchymosis in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 28 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Uzdan Uz, Kıvanç Günhan, Görkem Eskiizmir, Sabri Mutlu
- PMID
- 42803349
- DOI
- 10.1177/26893614261490686
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (top studies of the week, 4 October 2026): Intraoperative ice pack reduces pain after rhinoplasty
- Picked for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (top studies of the week, 4 October 2026): Intra‑operative ice pack reduces pain after rhinoplasty
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pain, periorbital edema, and ecchymosis are common after rhinoplasty. Intraoperative ice pack application may reduce these sequelae. OBJECTIVE: To compare 5- and 10-min intraoperative ice pack application with no intraoperative cooling after rhinoplasty. METHODS: Thirty-three patients undergoing primary reduction rhinoplasty were randomized to 5-min ice pack application (Group A, n = 11), 10-min ice pack application (Group B, n = 11), or no intraoperative ice pack application (Group C, n = 11). Periorbital edema (0-4), ecchymosis (0-5), and pain (0-10 VAS) were assessed on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. RESULTS: Pain scores were lower in both ice pack application groups than in the control group on postoperative days 1 (Group A: 4.46 ± 0.72; Group B: 3.96 ± 0.85; Group C: 5.46 ± 0.93; p = 0.003) and 3 (Group A: 3.82 ± 0.56; Group B: 3.41 ± 0.86; Group C: 5.09 ± 0.63; p < 0.001). Edema did not differ among groups on days 1 or 3 but was lower in Groups A and B on day 7 (Group A: 0.09 ± 0.25; Group B: 0.09 ± 0.29; Group C: 0.36 ± 0.47; p = 0.019). Ecchymosis did not differ among groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative ice pack application was associated with lower pain scores after rhinoplasty. No significant reduction in ecchymosis was observed, and the effect on edema was limited.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.