Use of Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists for Insomnia and the Risk of Falls and Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Journal
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Q1)
- Published
- 26 September 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Arianna Paolone, Shehraz Riar, Shajjan Vejayavarnan, Alexandra Papaioannou, George Ioannidis, Justin Lee
- PMID
- 42799573
- DOI
- 10.1111/jgs.70745
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Epidemiology (paper of the day, 28 September 2026).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Falls are the leading cause of injury in older adults. Sedative-hypnotic use is a known risk factor, but their use for insomnia continues to be common. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are a new, potentially safer class of medications for insomnia. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of DORAs on falls and fractures. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to August 2025 for studies reporting falls and fractures in DORA users and non-users. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies that reported data on falls and/or fractures for participants using DORAs in any clinical setting were included. Citation screening, full-text review, and data abstraction were conducted in duplicate. Random-effects model meta-analyses were conducted. The primary outcomes were the incidence or rates of falls and fractures among adults using DORAs compared to non-users. We also calculated the optimal information size (OIS), which is the minimum number of events needed to detect a clinically meaningful effect. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (10 RCTs, 9 observational, 183,595 participants) met inclusion criteria. Across all studies, DORA use did not increase the risk of falls compared to non-use (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56-1.04). RCT data suggest a reduction in fall risk (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.98) not seen in observational studies (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.31). No association was observed between DORAs and fractures (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: DORAs do not appear to increase the risk of falls or fractures in adults. Although these findings suggest that DORAs may be safer alternatives to traditional insomnia agents, low event rates, failure to meet the OIS, and limited data in older adults warrant cautious interpretation. Further research is needed to validate these findings and better characterize the relationship between DORAs and falls and fractures, particularly in older adults.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.