Skip to main content

Mid- to long-term follow-up of trabecular titanium acetabular cups in hip revision surgery for acetabular bone defects

Journal
Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy (Q1)
Published
24 September 2026
Study design
Cohort / observational study
Evidence level
Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
Authors
Lorenza Siracusano, Federico De Meo, Antongiulio Bruschetta, Giorgio Cacciola, Angela Alibrandi, Danilo Leonetti, et al.
PMID
42781506
DOI
10.1177/11207000261474821

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acetabular defects can be restored using different surgical techniques. Excellent results have been observed with trabecular titanium (TT) which mimic the structure of trabecular bone. The aim of our study is to evaluate the mid-to-long-term outcome in revision surgery due to severe acetabular defect using TT cups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing revision with Paprosky IIa or higher using modular TT cup. We evaluated clinical outcomes using FJS, WOMAC, OHS, and WORQ. Radiolucency and integration were used to assess radiographic results. We collected information on complications and revisions. RESULTS: Data from 217 consecutive patients was collected. Mean age was 71,01 ± 11,40 years. In regard to diagnosis, patients were affected by: aseptic loosening (55,3%); debris-induced osteolysis (18%); infection (11,5%); PPF (7.8%); and dislocation (7.4%). At the final floow-up, we documented the following: OHS 35.06 ± 4,31; WORQ 26.69 ± 4.18; WOMAC 27.59 ± 7.57; FJS of 55.3 ± 10.39 (p-value < 0.005). Complication rate was 9.2%. The most frequent complication was dislocation, followed by deep infection and aseptic loosening. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve showed a 96.3% rate of acetabular implant survival at 12 years. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This is the study with the largest population using TT for acetabular defects. We report good outcomes and an acceptable rate of complications, also due to implant modularity allowing stable fixation with secondary osseointegration.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.