Skip to main content

Efficacy and cosmetic outcomes of radiotherapy modalities in early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

In brief

Hypofractionated breast radiation showed 22% lower odds of ipsilateral recurrence

In a review of 36 studies involving 32,655 patients, hypofractionated whole-breast radiation had the lowest recurrence rate and 22% lower odds of recurrence than conventional whole-breast radiation. Three-dimensional conformal and intensity-modulated radiation ranked best for cosmetic outcomes, but evidence on appearance was limited; randomized trials are needed to confirm which approaches offer the best balance.

Journal
Frontiers in oncology (Q2)
Published
9 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Yushan Dong, Tingting Liu, Peng Wang, Songjiang Liu
PMID
42780047
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2026.1876930

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Epidemiology (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026).

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Breast cancer (BC) is a common malignancy with increasing annual incidence. Radiotherapy shows favorable clinical efficacy in BC management, but limited randomized controlled trial data is a major limitation. Therefore, further validation of the optimal radiotherapeutic strategy for early-stage BC is required. This network meta-analysis evaluated radiotherapy regimens' effects on efficacy and cosmetic outcomes in early-stage BC, guiding clinical practice. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials and cohort studies investigating radiotherapy approaches for early-stage BC. Data screening and extraction were independently performed using a standardized protocol. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The primary endpoint was ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR), and secondary endpoints included locoregional recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and cosmetic outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.4.1 and STATA 18.0. A total of 36 studies involving 32,655 patients and 9 interventions were included. The lowest IBR rate was observed in patients treated with hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 10.54%), followed by conventional fractionated whole-breast irradiation (CF-WBI) (SUCRA, 35.70%). Compared with CF-WBI, intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOeRT) (odds ratio [OR], 4.19; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.83-10.26), intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) (OR, 1.75; 95% CrI, 1.06-2.87), and HF-WBI (OR, 0.78; 95% CrI, 0.56-0.99) demonstrated statistically significant differences. The best cosmetic outcomes were achieved with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) (SUCRA, 14.43%), followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (SUCRA, 16.04%). Compared with CF-WBI, 3D-CRT (OR, 0.11; 95% CrI, 0.01-0.85), IMRT (OR, 0.13; 95% CrI, 0.01-0.72), and IOeRT (OR, 0.25; 95% CrI, 0.04-0.78) showed statistically significant improvements. Since evidence supporting cosmetic outcomes is limited, findings should be interpreted with caution. Among patients with early-stage BC, HF-WBI was associated with the lowest rate of postoperative ipsilateral recurrence, whereas CF-WBI was associated with the second-lowest rate. In terms of cosmetic outcomes, 3D-CRT and IMRT demonstrated favorable clinical efficacy. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify the comparative advantages and limitations of CF-WBI, HF-WBI, 3D-CRT, and IMRT, thereby strengthening the evidence base for early-stage BC radiotherapy strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251173161.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.