Evaluating a guideline-aligned prednisone threshold within the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS): associations with damage accrual
- Journal
- RMD open (Q1)
- Published
- 23 September 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Ioannis Parodis, Rama Andraos, Matteo Bottai, Christopher Sjöwall
- PMID
- 42778332
- DOI
- 10.1136/rmdopen-2026-007162
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Rheumatology (paper of the day, 28 September 2026): Evaluating prednisone threshold within LLDAS for SLE damage
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a modified Lupus Low Disease Activity State with a prednisone-equivalent threshold ≤5 mg/day (LLDAS-5) is more strongly associated with lower damage accrual than conventional LLDAS using a ≤7.5 mg/day threshold (LLDAS-7.5) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We analysed 332 patients, including 105 incident cases. For each patient, yearly Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) worsening occasions and average proportion of follow-up spent in LLDAS-5 and LLDAS-7.5 were derived. Patient-level Poisson regression with follow-up years as the exposure and Huber's robust variance estimator estimated rate ratios (RRs). Parallel models were fitted for the two definitions. Full-cohort multivariable models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, SLE duration, baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 and baseline SDI. RESULTS: In the full cohort, 142/332 patients experienced at least one SDI increase (190 occasions). Crude RRs were 0.61 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.00; p=0.052) for LLDAS-5 and 0.73 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.37; p=0.332) for LLDAS-7.5. Multivariable RRs were 0.56 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.86; p=0.007) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.85; p=0.012), respectively, with similar model fit. Among incident cases, 29/105 patients accrued damage (29 occasions); both LLDAS-5 (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.89; p=0.029) and LLDAS-7.5 (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.93; p=0.036) were associated with lower damage accrual. CONCLUSION: Longer time in LLDAS-5 was robustly associated with less damage accrual. Crude full-cohort analyses suggested a numerically stronger inverse association and slightly better model fit for LLDAS-5, but this apparent advantage was not sustained after multivariable adjustment. These findings support LLDAS-5 as a clinically meaningful, guideline-aligned target, while its incremental prognostic value over conventional LLDAS-7.5 requires further study.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.