Skip to main content

Incidence and characteristics of teprotumumab-associated ototoxicity in thyroid eye disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In brief

Teprotumumab is linked to ear-related effects in 27% of patients

Across 22 studies, about 1 in 4 teprotumumab-treated patients had an ear-related adverse effect; clinically significant ototoxicity occurred in about 8%. Among affected patients, 39% had persistent impairment at last follow-up. Rates varied with how patients were monitored, so the estimates are approximate, but the findings support baseline hearing tests and active monitoring during treatment.

Journal
Survey of ophthalmology (Q1)
Published
23 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Ssu-Hsien Lee, Lu-Ya Kuo, Tsung-Hsien Tsai
PMID
42778038
DOI
10.1016/j.survophthal.2026.09.005

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Ophthalmology (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): Meta‑analysis of teprotumumab‑associated ototoxicity in thyroid eye disease

Abstract

Teprotumumab, the first approved therapy for thyroid eye disease, is highly effective, but has been increasingly associated with otologic adverse events, prompting a United States Food and Drug Administration warning regarding hearing impairment in 2023. Reported incidence varies widely across studies, and the true burden of toxicity remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception through May, 2026 (PROSPERO CRD420261337579), identifying 22 eligible studies (5 randomized controlled trials and 17 observational studies) comprising 856 teprotumumab-treated patients. The pooled incidence of any otologic adverse event was 27.3% (95% CI, 20.8-34.3%), including subjective hearing loss, tinnitus, aural fullness, and autophony. Clinically significant ototoxicity occurred in 7.7% (95% CI, 3.1-13.8%), while objective audiometric ototoxicity was detected in 20.0% (95% CI, 10.0-32.0%) of patients undergoing serial audiometric monitoring. Compared with placebo, teprotumumab increased the risk of otologic adverse events nearly four-fold (risk ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3-10.1). Among affected patients, 39.0% (95% CI, 18.0-62.0%) had persistent impairment at last follow-up. Ascertainment method was the major source of between-study heterogeneity, with active surveillance identifying substantially higher event rates than passive reporting (42.0% vs. 20.0%). Preexisting hearing loss, older age, and diabetes were associated with increased risk. Although overlap-adjusted findings were consistent, heterogeneity in design, ascertainment, definitions, and follow-up means these estimates should be regarded as approximate rather than definitive. These results support baseline audiometric assessment, active symptom surveillance during treatment, and informed counseling regarding the potential for persistent hearing impairment. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420261337579.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.