Efficacy and Safety of Cannabinoid-Based Interventions for Low Back Pain and Migraine: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
In brief
THC-CBD vapor eased acute migraine, while cannabis extract improved chronic back pain
In five randomized trials involving 1,072 adults, vaporized THC plus CBD improved short-term migraine outcomes, and a standardized full-spectrum cannabis extract improved pain and related outcomes in chronic low back pain. A single oral dose of CBD did not beat placebo for acute back pain, and evidence for nabilone was very uncertain; benefits appear formulation- and condition-specific, not a class effect.
- Journal
- Cannabis and cannabinoid research (Q1)
- Published
- 22 September 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Claudete da Costa-Oliveira, Magnólia de Jesus Castro, Luiza Aparecida Luna Silvério, Maria Fernanda Barros de Oliveira Brandão, Ygor Jessé Ramos, Priscila Gava Mazzola
- PMID
- 42773786
- DOI
- 10.1177/25785125261490003
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top paper
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Low back pain, migraine, and other headache disorders are major contributors to disability, and interest in cannabinoid-based interventions has increased despite uncertainty regarding their indication-specific therapeutic value. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of isolated cannabinoids, synthetic cannabinoids, vaporized Cannabis products, and standardized Cannabis extracts for low back pain, migraine, and medication-overuse headache. METHODS: Electronic databases, trial registries, and supplementary sources were searched for double-blind randomized clinical trials in adults. Eligible studies were assessed using Risk of Bias 2, synthesized narratively according to synthesis without meta-analysis guidance, and rated for certainty using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (PROSPERO registration: 582772). RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials involving 1,072 participants met the inclusion criteria. In acute low back pain, a single 400-mg oral dose of isolated cannabidiol was not superior to placebo. In acute migraine, vaporized tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) plus cannabidiol (CBD) improved 2-h pain relief, pain freedom, and freedom from the most bothersome symptom, with sustained benefits observed for selected outcomes through 24-48 h, compared with placebo, whereas a CBD-dominant formulation showed no clear benefit. In medication-overuse headache and chronic musculoskeletal pain, nabilone showed favorable but very uncertain signals for pain-related outcomes and analgesic consumption. In chronic low back pain, a phase III trial showed that the standardized full-spectrum Cannabis extract VER-01 improved pain intensity, disability, sleep quality, and patient-reported outcomes compared with placebo. THC-containing inhaled formulations were associated with more psychoactive adverse effects and possible functional unblinding. CONCLUSION: Current randomized evidence does not support a class-wide effect of cannabinoid-based therapies for low back pain or headache disorders. Efficacy appears to depend on indication, formulation, route of administration, and cannabinoid composition. Moderate-certainty evidence supports vaporized THC + CBD for acute migraine outcomes, including 2-h efficacy and sustained response for selected outcomes through 24-48 h and VER-01 for chronic low back pain; evidence for single-dose oral cannabidiol and nabilone remains very uncertain. Larger independently replicated trials using analytically standardized formulations, harmonized outcomes, active-placebo strategies when THC is present, and additional studies evaluating repeated use across multiple migraine attacks and longer-term safety are needed.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.