Effects of TENS, NMES, and Combination Therapy on Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain and Function After Stroke
- Journal
- Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Q1)
- Published
- 22 September 2026
- Study design
- Unclassified
- Evidence level
- Level 5, Expert Opinion (CEBM 5)
- Authors
- Sevinç Külekçioğlu, Merve Korukcu, Zübeyde Kurtoğlu, Levent Yazmalar
- PMID
- 42772542
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2026.09.013
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Rehabilitation (paper of the day, 25 September 2026): Prospective randomized study, stroke shoulder pain
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), and their combination in hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP), upper limb function, and joint range of motion (ROM) in patients with acute and subacute stroke. DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty patients were assessed for eligibility. Five patients were excluded before randomization. Seventy-five participants were randomized, and sixty completed the study (TENS, n = 21; TENS+NMES, n = 20; NMES, n = 19). INTERVENTIONS: All groups received a standardized rehabilitation program consisting of positioning, ROM exercises, stretching, strengthening, and task-oriented upper extremity training for 60 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. Group 1 received TENS, Group 2 received combined TENS+NMES, and Group 3 received NMES MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: upper extremity motor function assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), shoulder pain and disability assessed using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), spasticity assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), activities of daily living (ADL) assessed using the Barthel Index (BI), and shoulder ROM measured by goniometry. RESULTS: All treatment groups showed significant improvements in VAS, Fugl-Meyer, SPADI, BI, and ROM scores after treatment. The TENS+NMES group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in pain and SPADI scores than the TENS group. However, post hoc analysis showed no significant difference between the TENS+NMES and NMES groups for SPADI. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TENS or NMES alone, the combined intervention improved pain, shoulder-related limitations, and shoulder ROM, but not upper extremity motor function, spasticity, or activities of daily living. Combined electrical stimulation may be a useful adjunct for pain and shoulder function during early stroke rehabilitation, although larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.