Skip to main content

Intradermal hepatitis B vaccination with or without Imiquimod in cirrhosis after prior vaccine nonresponse: A Randomised Trial

Journal
JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology (Q1)
Published
21 September 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Vincent Haghnejad, Mélissa Lucas, Nicolas Jacquinot, Hélène Jeulin, Sebastien Daude, Mouni Bensenane-Oussalah, et al.
PMID
42767612
DOI
10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.102039

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Internal Medicine (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): Intradermal hepatitis B vaccination vs IM in cirrhosis non‑responders

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with cirrhosis show impaired immune responses to standard intramuscular (IM) hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination, resulting in low seroconversion rates. Intradermal (ID) vaccination and topical imiquimod have been proposed as strategies to enhance vaccine immunogenicity. We conducted a randomized controlled pilot trial to compare three HBV revaccination strategies in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD) who previously failed standard IM vaccination: IM revaccination, ID revaccination, and ID revaccination combined with imiquimod (ID+IMQ). The primary endpoint was seroconversion at Month 7, defined as anti-HBs titres ≥10 mIU/mL. METHODS: This monocentric, prospective study included 59 patients with ACLD and anti-HBs titres <10 mIU/mL after prior HBV vaccination. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either IM vaccination (n=19; Engerix-B® 20 μg IM at Months 0, 1 and 6), ID vaccination (n=19; two 10 μg ID injections at the same time points), or ID vaccination preceded by topical imiquimod 5% application (n=21). RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis, seroprotection rates at month 7 were 36.8% in the IM group, 84.2% in the ID group, and 66.7% in the ID+IMQ group (p<0.01). After Bonferroni correction, only the ID versus IM comparison remained statistically significant (p=0.003). Geometric mean anti-HBs titres were significantly higher in the ID (116 mIU/mL) and ID+IMQ (107 mIU/mL) groups compared with the IM group (12 mIU/mL) (p=0.004). No severe vaccine-related adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intradermal HBV revaccination significantly improves seroconversion in non-responder patients with ACLD compared with IM vaccination, without additional benefit from imiquimod. These results support further evaluation of intradermal vaccination without imiquimod in a phase 3 trial. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: The study protocol has been registered before the patients' recruitment, in the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) of the European Medicine Agency (2021-000644-22), as well as on ClinicalTrials. gov (NCT05028322).

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.