Skip to main content

Preventing pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

In brief

Omitting drains after left pancreatectomy lowers fistula risk

A meta-analysis of 46 randomized trials found that not placing surgical drains during left-sided pancreatectomy significantly reduced grade B/C pancreatic fistula rates, with high-certainty evidence supporting this approach. Peri-operative somatostatin analogues and corticosteroids also lowered fistula risk, though the steroid data are less certain. Further trials, especially in high-risk patients and combining strategies, are needed.

Journal
BJS open (Q1)
Published
4 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Roberto M Montorsi, Alessio Marchetti, Tessa E Hendriks, Freek Daams, Olivier R Busch, Bas Groot Koerkamp, et al.
PMID
42765565
DOI
10.1093/bjsopen/zrag088

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
  • Picked for Pediatric Surgery (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): Preventing pancreatic fistula meta‑analysis
  • Picked for Spine Surgery (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026).
  • Picked for Surgery (top studies of the week, 27 September 2026): Meta‑analysis of RCTs preventing pancreatic fistula

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of postoperative morbidity and mortality after partial pancreatectomy is attributable to postoperative pancreatic fistula. Several interventions to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula have been assessed in randomized clinical trials but consensus on their efficacy is lacking. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials focusing on strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after all types of partial pancreatectomy. METHODS: Eligible randomized clinical trials assessing postoperative pancreatic fistula following partial pancreatectomy were included from the Evidence Map of Pancreatic Surgery database (2005-2025). As primary endpoint, both the 2005 and 2016 International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery definitions of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula were accepted. Interventions shown to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula in at least one randomized trial were identified, and meta-analysis undertaken for those with at least three available trials, irrespective of their outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 193 RCTs were included with 29 408 patients from 24 countries. The pooled rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C was 15.1%: 14.2% after pancreatoduodenectomy and 19.1% after left pancreatectomy. Overall, 24 trials identified 18 interventions as effective in reducing the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 intraoperative and 7 postoperative. Eight interventions were eligible for meta-analysis, involving 46 trials. Following meta-analysis, three interventions remained effective: drain omission in left pancreatectomy, perioperative use of somatostatin analogues, and administration of perioperative corticosteroids. The certainty of evidence was high for drain omission, moderate for somatostatin analogues, and low for corticosteroids. Eleven trials focused specifically on high-risk patients and four on ongoing postoperative pancreatic fistula. No trial combined interventions. CONCLUSION: Omission of drains in left pancreatectomy, perioperative use of somatostatin analogues, and administration of perioperative corticosteroids are effective strategies to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatectomy. However, current evidence remains immature and further RCTs evaluating these interventions are warranted, as they are likely to change the conclusions of subsequent meta-analyses. Such trials could potentially focus on high-risk patient cohorts and/or assess combinations of interventions.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.