Association between surgical repair timing and mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Journal
- Clinical and experimental pediatrics (Q1)
- Published
- 17 September 2026
- Study design
- Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
- Authors
- Veerabhadra Radhakrishna, Bharathi Balachander, Sanjana Hansoge Somanath, Hejmady Aneesh Shenoy, Srinivas Balachander
- PMID
- 42755081
- DOI
- 10.3345/cep.2026.01837
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Neonatology (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Timing of CDH repair and mortality meta‑analysis
- Picked for Pediatric Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
- Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Not directly relevant to acute paediatric illness
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare congenital anomaly whose management involves a complex interplay between medical and surgical treatments. Stabilization prior to surgery is vital. However, the optimal timing of surgical repair and its relationship with mortality remain unknown. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between repair timing and mortality in neonates with CDH. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, NCBI, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, CINHAL, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, and Epistemonikos databases were searched for articles published through April 2026. Forty studies, including 2 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective observational studies, and 35 retrospective studies, were included in the meta-analysis. Newborns operated on within 24 hours of life had significantly higher mortality (relative risk [RR], 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76-3.66; P<0.001) than those operated on at or after 24 hours. This association persisted in a subgroup analysis restricted to contemporary studies published since 2000 (RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.00-6.62; P<0.001). Additional subgroup analyses demonstrated significantly higher mortality in neonates who underwent repair within 24 hours than in those who underwent repair at 24-48 hours (P<0.001), whereas mortality did not differ significantly between those who underwent repair at 24-48 hours and those who underwent repair after 48 hours (P=0.65). Surgical timing did not significantly alter mortality in a specific subset of newborns requiring ECMO support. In conclusion, a brief period of stabilization of at least 24 hours significantly improved survival among neonates with CDH, whereas delaying surgical repair beyond 48 hours conferred no additional survival benefits.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.