Preventing intraoperative hypotension in propofol-sedated gastroenteroscopy: a randomized trial of crystalloid preloading
- Journal
- Surgical endoscopy (Q1)
- Published
- 17 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Zemin Gao, Huanrui Wang, Xuyang Chen, Yangchao Li, Guilong Wang, Xin Zhang
- PMID
- 42754630
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00464-026-13385-1
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (paper of the day, 22 September 2026): Crystalloid preloading prevents intra‑operative hypotension in gastroenteroscopy
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) is common during propofol-sedated gastroenteroscopy, yet preventive strategies in outpatient settings remain limited. We evaluated whether crystalloid preloading reduces IOH. METHODS: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 606 patients were assigned to receive crystalloid preloading (10 mL/kg lactated Ringer's over 25 min) or no preprocedural fluid. The primary outcome was the incidence of IOH. Secondary outcomes included Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVC-CI), vasopressor use, recovery time, and adverse events. RESULTS: Six hundred and six participants were randomized into two groups, and 522 completed the trial per protocol. IOH occurred in 14.2% (43/303) of patients in the Preload group versus 25.4% (77/303) in the Control group (risk ratio = 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.78; P < 0.001), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 11.2% (number needed to treat=9). Preloading reduced ΔIVC-CI and ephedrine use (both P < 0.05). Propofol use, recovery time, procedure duration, and adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Crystalloid preloading reduces the incidence and severity of IOH during propofol-sedated gastroenteroscopy without increasing adverse events. This simple strategy may improve hemodynamic stability in outpatient anesthesia.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.