Skip to main content

Suzetrigine for Postoperative Pain in Head and Neck Free Flap or Transoral Robotic Surgery

In brief

Suzetrigine reduces inpatient opioid use by ~50 MME after head and neck surgery

In a retrospective cohort of 146 adults, adding suzetrigine to a multimodal regimen lowered median inpatient opioid consumption by roughly 50 morphine milligram equivalents compared with standard care, without changing pain scores or causing adverse events. The association persisted after adjustment, but the non-randomized design means prospective trials are needed before routine adoption.

Journal
JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery (Q1)
Published
17 September 2026
Study design
Prospective / inception cohort
Evidence level
Level 2, Moderate (CEBM 2b)
Authors
Daniel E Bestourous, Silvia Soule, Jacob Beiriger, Brayden Seliger, Austin Tautfest, Larkin Harris, et al.
PMID
42752794
DOI
10.1001/jamaoto.2026.2673

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Otorhinolaryngology (paper of the day, 18 September 2026): Post‑operative pain after head‑neck surgery, relevant analgesic strategy

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Postoperative pain after head and neck surgery frequently necessitates opioid analgesia despite multimodal pain regimens. Suzetrigine, a selective NaV1.8 inhibitor that was recently approved in the US for acute postoperative pain, may reduce postoperative opioid requirements. However, the current surgical literature regarding suzetrigine use after head and neck surgery is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of adjunctive suzetrigine use with postoperative opioid consumption after head and neck free flap reconstruction and transoral robotic surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary academic referral center of adult patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction or transoral robotic surgery from January 1 to December 31, 2025. Patients with chronic high-dose opioid use, chronic pain disorders, liver dysfunction, or unavailable opioid data were excluded. EXPOSURE: Protocolized multimodal analgesic regimen with or without adjunctive suzetrigine. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumed and MME consumption per hospital day. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, 30-day readmissions, emergency department visits, oral intake consumption, postoperative pain scores, and medication-related adverse events. RESULTS: Of 146 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.8 [13.9] years; 48 female [32.9%] and 98 male [67.1%]) included in the analysis, 41 (28.1%) received suzetrigine plus multimodal analgesia and 105 (71.9%) received standard multimodal analgesia; 114 (78.1%) underwent free flap reconstruction and 32 (21.9%) underwent transoral robotic surgery. Median inpatient opioid use was lower among patients in the free flap group receiving suzetrigine compared with those in the control (109.0 vs 142.1 MMEs; median difference, -50.0; 95% CI, -119.0 to -5.1). Among patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery, suzetrigine was associated with lower inpatient opioid use (29.0 vs 108.9 MMEs; median difference, -56.0; 95% CI, -110.0 to -5.5). Suzetrigine remained independently associated with lower opioid use after multivariable adjustment (adjusted median difference, -76.4 MMEs; 95% CI, -138.8 to -13.9). Postoperative pain scores were similar between groups. No medication-related adverse events were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, adjunctive suzetrigine use was associated with lower postoperative opioid requirements after head and neck free flap reconstruction and transoral robotic surgery. Given the retrospective, nonrandomized design, these findings should be interpreted as associations warranting prospective confirmation.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.