Blinatumomab for Replacing Chemotherapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
In brief
Blinatumomab boosts 4-year event-free survival to 83% versus 70% with chemo
In a randomized trial of 709 children with high-risk B-cell ALL, replacing two chemotherapy cycles with blinatumomab raised 4-year event-free survival to 83% compared with 70% for standard therapy. Infections fell dramatically (24% vs 69%), but neuro-toxic events were three times more common. Long-term safety and optimal integration into treatment regimens remain to be defined.
- Journal
- The New England journal of medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 17 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Martin Schrappe, Franco Locatelli, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Gerhard Zugmaier, Michaela Vossen-Gajcy, Jan Starý, et al.
- PMID
- 42748428
- DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa2604166
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Pediatrics and Child Health (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Blinatumomab vs chemotherapy RCT in ALL
- Picked for Hematology (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Blinatumomab replaces chemo in pediatric ALL RCT
- Picked for Oncology and Radiation Oncology (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Phase III trial of blinatumomab replacing chemotherapy in pediatric ALL
- Picked for Pediatric Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Blinatumomab for Replacing Chemotherapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
- Picked for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager targeting the CD19 antigen on B cells, may offer an option to safely replace cycles of traditional chemotherapy in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, children with high-risk B-cell ALL to receive two cycles of blinatumomab (blinatumomab group) or two cycles of chemotherapy (control group) after consolidation. The primary end point was event-free survival as evaluated in a time-to-event analysis; the duration of event-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first event among resistance to protocol treatment, relapse, second cancer, or death from any cause. Our primary objective was to evaluate whether the 4-year event-free survival would be 10 percentage points higher in the blinatumomab group than in the control group. RESULTS: Overall, 709 of 768 eligible patients (92.3%) underwent randomization; 358 were assigned to the blinatumomab group and 351 to the control group. A planned interim analysis at a median follow-up of 2.9 years showed an estimated 4-year event-free survival of 83.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.4 to 87.4) in the blinatumomab group and 70.3% (95% CI, 63.8 to 75.9) in the control group (P = 0.0002 in an intention-to-treat analysis). The estimated hazard ratio for a primary end-point event (blinatumomab vs. control) was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.73) as assessed with a Cox model. Infection related to the trial treatment occurred in 23.9% of patients in the blinatumomab group and in 69.4% of those in the control group (P<0.001). Life-threatening adverse events occurred in 2 patients (0.5%) in the blinatumomab group, including one (in 0.3%) that was fatal, and in 16 patients (4.7%) in the control group. Neurotoxic events were reported in 12.0% and 3.2%, respectively (P<0.001). Cytokine release syndrome of grade 2 or higher occurred in 1.1% of patients in the blinatumomab group. CONCLUSIONS: In children with newly diagnosed high-risk B-cell ALL, replacement of two cycles of highly toxic conventional chemotherapy with blinatumomab resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients with event-free survival at 4 years. (Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe and others; AIEOP-BFM ALL 2017 EudraCT number, 2016-001935-12; EU Clinical Trials number, 2023-509856-32-00; and ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03643276.).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.