Short or Long Antibiotic Regimens in Orthopedics
In brief
One-week systemic antibiotics match four-week course after orthopedic infection surgery
In 475 adults who received a local-antibiotic implant during surgery, definite treatment failure by 12 months occurred in 11% of those given up to 7 days of systemic antibiotics versus 14% of those given at least 4 weeks, meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. Short-course patients also reported far fewer treatment-related symptoms (17% vs 45%). The finding supports limiting systemic therapy, though longer-term outcomes remain to be studied.
- Journal
- The New England journal of medicine (Q1)
- Published
- 16 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Martin McNally, Maria Dudareva, Michelle Kümin, Werner Vach, Claire L Scarborough, Matthew J Cichero, et al.
- PMID
- 42748421
- DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa2506756
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Surgical Oncology (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Orthopedic infection antibiotics, unrelated to cancer surgery
- Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
- Picked for Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Antibiotic duration in orthopedics, not GI
- Picked for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal
- Picked for Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Short‑course antibiotics non‑inferior after orthopaedic infection
- Picked for Pediatric Surgery (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Short or Long Antibiotic Regimens in Orthopedics
- Picked for Radiation Oncology (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Recent Radiation Oncology research from a high-quartile journal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orthopedic infection is usually managed with surgery and prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy. Whether local antibiotics delivered by a product implanted at the infection site during surgery can reduce the duration of systemic antibiotic therapy is unclear. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adults who had undergone surgery for orthopedic infection and implantation of a local-antibiotic carrier to receive postoperative systemic antibiotic therapy for a long (≥4 weeks) or short (≤7 days) duration. The primary outcome was definite treatment failure by 12 months, assessed according to protocol-defined criteria by a clinical end-point committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. The noninferiority margin was 10 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients underwent randomization, of whom 475 were assessed in the primary analysis. Definite treatment failure occurred in 34 of 241 patients (14.1%) in the long-duration group and in 26 of 234 patients (11.1%) in the short-duration group (risk difference [negative values favor the short duration], -3.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.0 to 3.0), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin. In sensitivity analyses in the included population (497 patients) and the per-protocol population (457 patients), results were consistent with those of the primary analysis (risk difference, -2.4 percentage points [95% CI, -8.2 to 3.5] and -2.7 percentage points [95% CI, -8.8 to 3.4], respectively). By week 6 after surgery, symptoms potentially related to treatment had occurred in 45.2% of the patients in the long-duration group and in 17.2% of those in the short-duration group (risk difference, -28.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -36.4 to -19.6). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who had undergone orthopedic surgery and received local antibiotics, a short course of systemic antibiotics was noninferior to a long course with respect to definite treatment failure by 12 months. (Funded by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society and others; SOLARIO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03806166.).
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.