Skip to main content

Efficacy of efruxifermin in improving liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal
European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology (Q2)
Published
5 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Zain Ul Abideen, Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Areeba Shoaib, Muhammad Osama, Tehreem Fatima, Muhammad Hasnain Panjwani, et al.
PMID
42734207
DOI
10.1097/MEG.0000000000003259

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Histology (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026).
  • Picked for Transplantation (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026): Fibrosis drug meta‑analysis, no transplant endpoint
  • Picked for Biochemistry (medical) (top studies of the week, 20 September 2026).

Abstract

In addition to demonstrating a predominant association with liver morbidity and mortality, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) constitutes a leading cause of liver transplantation. Efruxifermin, a bivalently linked fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, inhibits fibrosis and protects hepatocytes from cellular distress. Although phase 2 clinical trials have investigated its histological and biochemical effects on the improvement of fibrosis, the results lack a pooled synthesis. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to retrieve relevant articles from inception till July 2025. Data for various outcomes were extracted after computing the risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences with 95% CIs for continuous outcomes. The quality assessment of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool. A total of four RCTs were included. Efruxifermin demonstrated a higher incidence of improvement in liver fibrosis by greater than or equal to one stage without worsening of MASH (risk ratio = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.14-2.62; P = 0.01). With regards to noninvasive biomarkers of fibrosis, efruxifermin showed improvement in enhanced liver fibrosis score (mean difference = -0.59; 95% CI = -0.87 to -0.32; P < 0.0001), N-terminal type-III collagen pro-peptide (Pro-C3; mean difference = -6.38; 95% CI = -10.44 to -2.32; P = 0.002) and liver stiffness by FibroScan (mean difference = -2.66; 95% CI = -4.32 to -1.01; P = 0.002). However, it demonstrated a higher risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (risk ratio = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.01-1.38; P = 0.04) compared to placebo. Subgroup analysis stratified by efruxifermin dosages showed that treatment with 28 mg dose (risk ratio = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.08-2.72; P = 0.02) and 50 mg dose (risk ratio = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.11-2.76; P = 0.02) showed significant improvement in fibrosis by greater than or equal to one stage without worsening of MASH. Among the various pharmacologic interventions, efruxifermin combines clinically meaningful antifibrotic efficacy with systemic metabolic improvements in a balanced profile.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.