Skip to main content

The Effect of Varenicline Nasal Spray on the Signs and Symptoms of Dry Eye Disease and Tear Film Stability: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) (Q1)
Published
6 September 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
P Dee Stephenson, Cynthia Matossian
PMID
42724843
DOI
10.2147/OPTH.S610688

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Ophthalmology (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): High-quality evidence in a top journal

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of varenicline nasal spray (VNS) 0.03 mg on the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease (DED) and tear film stability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, placebo-controlled study, 50 DED subjects were randomized to receive either VNS 0.03 mg nasal spray or its vehicle twice daily for 28 days. Study parameters included dry eye questionnaire score (DEQS), eye dryness score (EDS), corneal (CFS) and conjunctival fluorescein staining, non-invasive tear break-up time (TBUT), surface asymmetry index (SAI), and surface regularity index (SRI). RESULTS: Post treatment, the improvement in mean symptom scores, including DEQS (23% vs 12%, p=0.022) and EDS (44% vs 27%, p = 0.012), was significantly higher in the VNS group compared to the vehicle group. The mean CFS and conjunctival staining scores also showed significantly higher improvement (~50% vs ~20%, p<0.001) in the VNS group compared to the vehicle. The mean change in non-invasive TBUT was higher in the VNS group (70% vs 30%, p = 0.680). The mean improvement in SAI and SRI were comparable between the two groups. There were no serious adverse events in either group. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant improvement in the symptoms and signs of DED in the VNS group. These results indicate that improving natural tear production using VNS nasal spray can help foster tear film stability and ocular homeostasis over time. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05514041.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.