Skip to main content

Peri-operative Percutaneous Nerve Blocks and Catheters in Major Lower Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (Q1)
Published
10 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Harri G Jones, Rhiannon Nielsen, Katrin Abdelgafar, Praveena Pemmasani, Brenig Gwilym, Philip Pallmann, et al.
PMID
42722187
DOI
10.1016/j.ejvs.2026.09.013

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Major lower limb amputation is associated with substantial post-operative pain. While surgically placed nerve catheters are commonly used, the role of peri-operative percutaneous peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) and percutaneous peripheral nerve catheters (PNCs) for anaesthesia and or post-operative analgesia remains incompletely defined. This systematic review synthesised the published evidence on post-operative outcomes associated with PNBs and PNCs in patients undergoing major lower limb amputation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched (1 January 2005 to 1 March 2025). METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251233062). Exploratory meta-analyses of post-operative acute pain, opioid requirements, phantom limb pain, and mortality were undertaken, with PNBs and PNCs grouped together as a single peripheral nerve intervention. GRADE criteria were used to express certainty of pooled results. RESULTS: Forty-one studies involving 913 patients undergoing PNB and or PNC were included, comprising randomised controlled trials (n = 4), observational studies (n = 10), and case series or reports (n = 27). PNBs and PNCs were most commonly used as an adjunct to general anaesthesia (54.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 51.2 - 58.0%), followed by sole anaesthesia (22.9%, 95% CI 20.2 - 25.9%) and adjunct use with sedation (22.5%, 95% CI 19.7 - 25.4%), and were almost always performed pre-operatively. Compared with general anaesthesia alone, PNB/PNC ± general anaesthesia use was associated with lower post-operative 0 - 10 pain scores (mean difference [MD] -1.70, 95% CI -2.48 - -0.92; p < .001; I2 = 85.4%; GRADE, very low) and reduced post-operative opioid requirements (MD -18.28 mg, 95% CI -31.02 - -5.54; p = .005; I2 = 90.51%; GRADE, very low). Findings were maintained in subgroup analyses restricted to PNB/PNC use as an adjunct to general anaesthesia, for both acute pain scores and post-operative morphine requirements. PNB or PNC use did not impact long term pain. Complications were rare. CONCLUSION: PNB/PNC use may improve early pain outcomes after major lower limb amputation, without impacting longer term phantom limb pain.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.