Effects of Virtual Reality-Assisted Task-Oriented Training on Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes in Individuals with Rotator Cuff Tears: A Randomized Controlled Single-Blind Trial
- Journal
- Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation (Q1)
- Published
- 10 September 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Mehmet Canlı, İrem Canlı, Şafak Kuzu, Anıl Özüdoğru, Yusuf Topal, Hikmet Kocaman, et al.
- PMID
- 42722182
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2026.09.004
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Rehabilitation (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): Rotator cuff VR trial, orthopedic focus
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized controlled study was to examine the effects of virtual reality-assisted task-oriented training (VR-TOT) added to conventional physiotherapy in individuals with rotator cuff tears (RCT). DESIGN: Prospective, single-blinded, two-arm, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty individuals with partial RCT were randomized to the VR-TOT group (VR-TOTG, n = 30) or the control group (CG, n = 30). INTERVENTIONS: Both groups received six weeks of progressive conventional physiotherapy, while VR-TOTG additionally received VR-TOT based on activities of daily living. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was upper extremity function assessed using DASH. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity (VAS), shoulder-related pain and disability (SPADI), kinesiophobia (TSK), pain catastrophizing (PCS), psychological status (HADS), and grip and pinch strength. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, the mean between-group difference in change in DASH was -3.93 points (95% CI, -4.79 to -3.08; p<0.001), favoring the VR-TOTG. For the secondary outcomes, the mean between-group differences in change were -0.53 cm for resting pain (95% CI, -0.84 to -0.22; p=0.001), -1.23 cm for activity pain (95% CI, -1.53 to -0.94; p<0.001), -0.67 cm for night pain (95% CI, -0.87 to -0.46; p<0.001), -8.70 points for SPADI (95% CI, -10.29 to -7.11; p<0.001), -3.47 points for TSK (95% CI, -4.30 to -2.63; p<0.001), and -1.33 points for PCS (95% CI, -1.89 to -0.77; p<0.001), favoring the VR-TOTG. Between-group differences were not significant for HADS anxiety, HADS depression, HADS total score, hand grip strength, or pinch strength (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Adding VR-TOT to conventional physiotherapy resulted in a statistically greater short-term improvement in DASH, the primary outcome, together with additional improvements in pain, shoulder-related pain and disability, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing. However, the between-group DASH difference did not reach the published MCID, and longer-term studies are needed.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.