Skip to main content

Adjunctive empirical superior vena cava isolation with fourth-generation cryoballoon in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation does not improve outcomes and increases complications: the randomized CISPAF trial

Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine (Q1)
Published
26 August 2026
Study design
Randomized controlled trial
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
Authors
Vedran Pašara, Bruno Ban, Ivan Prepolec, Andrija Nekić, Zvonimir Katić, Domagoj Kardum, et al.
PMID
42718674
DOI
10.3389/fcvm.2026.1849859

Why clinicians should know about it

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but non-pulmonary vein triggers, particularly the superior vena cava (SVC), may contribute to recurrence. Cryoballoon (CB) ablation has been applied for empirical SVC isolation (SVCI), yet evidence is limited and inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: The CISPAF trial evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of adjunctive SVCI using a fourth-generation CB in patients undergoing first-time PVI for paroxysmal AF (PAF). METHODS: CISPAF was a prospective, randomized, single-centre trial including 149 patients with PAF assigned to PVI alone (n = 74) or PVI + SVCI (n = 75). Ablations were performed with a fourth-generation 28-mm CB. The primary endpoint was 12-month freedom from AF; safety endpoints included a composite of major procedure-related complications, with particular attention to phrenic nerve injury (PNI) and sinus node impairment. RESULTS: Acute PVI was achieved in all patients. SVCI succeeded in 62/75 (84.9%), with real-time isolation in 45 (60.0%). Major complications occurred only in the PVI + SVCI group (2.6% vs. 0%), including one sinus node injury requiring pacemaker implantation and one vascular complication requiring surgical repair. Transient or impending PNI and transient bradycardia/junctional rhythm were more frequent with PVI + SVCI (34.7% vs. 10.8% and 17.3% vs. 2.7%; respectively; both p < 0.01), but these events were self-limited and resolved after interruption of energy delivery. At 12 months, AF-free survival did not differ significantly between groups (89.3% vs. 79.7%; log-rank p = 0.096). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive SVCI using a fourth-generation CB did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in arrhythmia-free survival at one year and was associated with a higher incidence of procedure-related complications. These findings do not support the routine use of empirical SVCI during initial CB ablation for PAF and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.