The interventional effects of PNF training on functional ankle instability in habitually active adults
- Journal
- Frontiers in public health (Q1)
- Published
- 26 August 2026
- Study design
- Randomized controlled trial
- Evidence level
- Level 1, High (CEBM 1b)
- Authors
- Weiren Liao, Simao Xu, Rui Wang, Jingzhi Zhang
- PMID
- 42718668
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1923487
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Rehabilitation (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): PNF vs strength training for ankle instability
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Functional ankle instability (FAI) is common among habitually active adults and may lead to recurrent sprains, reduced athletic performance, and long-term joint dysfunction. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) training with strength-plus-balance training in habitually active adults with FAI. A total of 68 habitually active adults with FAI were randomly assigned to either a PNF training group or a strength-plus-balance training group, both undergoing an 8-week rehabilitation program. Outcome measures were assessed before and after the intervention and included the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), lower limb stability tests, Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), and ankle muscle strength assessments. After 8 weeks, a significant group × time interaction was observed for CAIT scores (p < 0.001), with improvements from 13.00 ± 2.48 to 24.07 ± 3.53 in the PNF training group and from 13.47 ± 2.45 to 20.13 ± 2.72 in the strength-plus-balance training group. PNF training also produced greater gains in overall balance ability, while strength-plus-balance training was more effective for enhancing ankle inversion strength (p = 0.039). In conclusion, both rehabilitation programs improved ankle function in habitually active adults with FAI; however, PNF training demonstrated superior improvements in overall balance, whereas strength-plus-balance training was more effective in enhancing ankle inversion strength. These findings may assist clinicians in selecting rehabilitation strategies according to specific therapeutic goals. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT06308809.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.