Clinical Characteristics and Use of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Scaffold (GalaFLEX™) in Primary and Secondary Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Structured Review of the Literature and Preliminary Single-Center Experience
- Journal
- Aesthetic plastic surgery (Q1)
- Published
- 9 September 2026
- Study design
- Retrospective cohort
- Evidence level
- Level 4, Very Low (CEBM 4)
- Authors
- Dmytro Oliinyk, Sophia Diesch, Anna Wiesmeier, Philipp Unbehaun, Andrea Pagani, Silvan Eisenmann, et al.
- PMID
- 42716980
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00266-026-06218-y
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (paper of the day, 13 September 2026): Implant-based reconstruction, P4HB scaffold outcomes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB, e.g., GalaFLEX™) is a bioabsorbable matrix with a broad spectrum of indications in surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence and data on its utilization in Europe in the breast reconstruction setting. OBJECTIVE: To report preliminary clinical experience with P4HB scaffolds in implant-based breast reconstruction, with a focus on operative technique and complication predictors, complemented by a structured literature review. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 20 patients with 31 operated breasts, who underwent mastectomy with implant-based reconstruction in combination with P4HB scaffold. Patient-specific and mastectomy-specific factors were evaluated in the timeframe from January 2024 to January 2025. Statistical analyses were performed using nonparametric and regression-based methods. RESULTS: Major complications were recorded for 25.8% of breasts. Higher BMI was associated with increased risk of seroma formation (p = 0.044). Lower resection weight was associated with more frequent rippling/asymmetry (p = 0.011) and showed a trend toward skin and/or NAC necrosis (p = 0.057), whereas smaller implants were linked to necrosis of the skin envelope (p = 0.027), and larger implants to seroma formation (p = 0.031). The Stewart approach mastectomy had lowest rates of seromas (p = 0.022). The specific P4HB utilization technique did not show significant associations with reported outcomes. More rippling/asymmetry were observed when P4HB was used without additional dermal or muscle flaps (28% vs. 0%). Our structured review identified 4 studies with 418 operated breasts where P4HB was utilized. Overall complication rate reached up to 43%, and two authors have reported about an increased risk of capsular contracture in P4HB-patients. CONCLUSION: P4HB scaffolds did not show an increased complication signal in this exploratory cohort. Mastectomy-specific and anatomical factors seem to be the most consistent predictors of early complications. Our data suggest that a conservative implant sizing strategy may be beneficial in selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.