Skip to main content

Telenursing to Improve Quality of Life in Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal
Cancer medicine (Q1)
Published
1 September 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Serena Ricchiuto, Diego Lopane, Stefano Mancin, Daniela Cattani, Alessandra Dacomi, Simone Cosmai, et al.
PMID
42702750
DOI
10.1002/cam4.72098

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Dermatology (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026): Meta‑analysis of telenursing for breast cancer QoL
  • Picked for Health Informatics (top studies of the week, 13 September 2026).

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Beyond the physical burden, the disease significantly impacts emotional well-being and quality of life (QoL). Telenursing, as a nurse-led telemedicine intervention, has emerged as a promising strategy to support patients remotely. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of nurse-led telenursing interventions on QoL in women with breast cancer and to compare the impact of different technological delivery modes. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 and the Cochrane Handbook. Studies were identified through five databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies comparing nurse-led telenursing to usual care were included. The primary outcome was QoL. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I; GRADE was used to rate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (n = 4199) were included in the systematic review. Seven studies provided sufficient quantitative data for meta-analysis. Overall, telenursing interventions showed a small to moderate pooled effect on quality of life (SMD = 0.40, 95% CI [0.09, 0.70]; p = 0.019); however, after trim-and-fill correction for potential publication bias, the adjusted estimate was attenuated and did not reach statistical significance (adjusted SMD = 0.14, 95% CI [-0.17, 0.45]; p = 0.376). Subgroup analyses-to be interpreted as exploratory-suggested a larger effect for mobile application-based interventions (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI [0.46, 0.80], I2 = 0%, k = 3) compared to telephone follow-up (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI [-0.34, 0.76], I2 = 85.2%, k = 4), though the small number of contributing studies limits the reliability of this comparison. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide preliminary evidence that nurse-led telenursing may be associated with improvements in quality of life in women with breast cancer, though the certainty of the evidence is low (GRADE: Low). Results should be interpreted with caution given the attenuation of the pooled effect to non-significance after trim-and-fill adjustment, substantial methodological heterogeneity, and the exploratory nature of subgroup comparisons. High-quality randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.