Clinical outcomes and functional preservation of microwave ablation versus surgical resection for benign thyroid nodules: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study
In brief
Microwave ablation cuts thyroid hormone dependence from 52% to 2%
In a propensity-matched cohort of 48 patients per arm, microwave ablation achieved an 86% nodule volume reduction and comparable symptom relief while requiring only 18 minutes of procedure time, minimal blood loss and a one-day stay. Only 2% needed thyroid hormone replacement versus 52% after surgery, suggesting a hormone-sparing alternative for benign nodules, pending larger randomized trials.
- Journal
- Frontiers in endocrinology (Q1)
- Published
- 13 August 2026
- Study design
- Retrospective cohort
- Evidence level
- Level 3, Low (CEBM 3b)
- Authors
- Wu Xiao, Lianghua Luo, Bing Yao, Yong Yang, Wei Chen
- PMID
- 42677130
- DOI
- 10.3389/fendo.2026.1822597
Why clinicians should know about it
- Picked for Breast and Endocrine Surgery (paper of the day, 4 September 2026): Propensity‑matched cohort, microwave ablation vs thyroidectomy outcomes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microwave ablation (MWA) is an organ-preserving minimally invasive option for symptomatic benign thyroid nodules. Comparative evidence on thyroid function preservation after MWA versus surgical resection (SR) remains limited, particularly when postoperative hormone replacement is separated by surgical extent. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 113 consecutive adults treated with ultrasound-guided MWA or SR for symptomatic or cosmetically concerning cytologically benign thyroid nodules between January 2022 and October 2024. Patients with abnormal preoperative thyroid function, hyperfunctioning nodules, known autoimmune thyroiditis, prior thyroid surgery, indeterminate or malignant cytology, pregnancy, or concurrent thyroid malignancy were excluded. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed using eight pre-specified baseline covariates, yielding 48 matched pairs. The primary outcome was thyroid hormone dependence at 12 months, reported as overall dependence and, separately, as new-onset hypothyroidism after organ-preserving procedures. Secondary outcomes included operative duration, blood loss, hospital stay, 12-month symptom score, complications, recurrence, and volume reduction rate (VRR) after MWA. RESULTS: After matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. MWA was associated with shorter operative duration (median 18.0 vs. 63.5 minutes), lower blood loss (1.5 vs. 53.5 mL), and shorter hospital stay (1.0 vs. 5.0 days; all P < 0.001). In the MWA group, median VRR reached 86.2% at 12 months. Symptom scores improved substantially from baseline in both groups (both P < 0.001), with comparable low 12-month symptom burden. Overall thyroid hormone dependence occurred in 1 of 48 MWA patients (2.1%) and 25 of 48 SR patients (52.1%). In the SR group, this included planned replacement after total thyroidectomy (14/14, 100%) and new-onset hypothyroidism after lobectomy or subtotal thyroidectomy (11/34, 32.4%). In the sensitivity analysis excluding total thyroidectomy, new-onset hypothyroidism remained lower after MWA (2.1% vs. 32.4%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with small-to-moderate symptomatic benign thyroid nodules, MWA achieved substantial nodule shrinkage and low symptom burden at 12 months while reducing perioperative burden and postoperative hormone dependence. These findings support MWA as an organ-preserving alternative to surgery in appropriately selected patients, although randomized multicenter studies with longer follow-up are needed.
Abstract as published, via PubMed.
For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.