Skip to main content

Early full or near-full enteral feeding in clinically stable preterm infants across healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

In brief

Early full feeding trims preterm hospital stay by four days

Starting full enteral feeds right after birth shortened length of stay by an average of 4.4 days and sped up weight regain and achievement of full feeds in stable preterm infants. Rates of feeding intolerance, necrotizing enterocolitis, infection and death were similar, but evidence certainty was low and safety remains uncertain.

Journal
Frontiers in medicine (Q1)
Published
17 August 2026
Study design
Systematic review / meta-analysis of RCTs
Evidence level
Level 1, High (CEBM 1a)
Authors
Li Chen, Yan Gao, Rui Liu, Zuofang Wang, Anzhen Wang, Jian Li, et al.
PMID
42676630
DOI
10.3389/fmed.2026.1921726

Why clinicians should know about it

  • Picked for Neonatology (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Systematic review of early full enteral feeding in clinically stable
  • Picked for Pediatric Surgery (top studies of the week, 6 September 2026): Systematic review of early enteral feeding in preterm infants, nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants are at high risk of feeding intolerance. Early full enteral feeding (EFEF) may promote gastrointestinal maturation and reduce hospital stay, but concerns exist about its generalizability across different healthcare contexts. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases and included nine randomized controlled trials comparing early full enteral feeding (EFEF), defined as initiation of full enteral feeding immediately after birth without parenteral nutrition or fluid supplementation, with gradual feeding strategies in preterm infants. Subgroup analyses were performed according to healthcare settings (high-income vs. low- and middle-income countries). The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials involving 2,777 infants were included. EFEF reduced length of hospital stay (MD = -4.41 days, 95% CI: -7.05 to -1.76), time to regain birth weight (MD = -2.29 days, 95% CI: -3.66 to -0.91), and time to achieve full enteral feeding (MD = -1.58 days, 95% CI: -2.32 to -0.84). No statistically significant difference was observed in feeding intolerance (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.49-1.22), necrotizing enterocolitis (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.38-2.09), invasive infection (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.43-1.57), mortality (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.55-2.09), or hypoglycaemia (RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.42-5.59), although the confidence intervals for serious adverse outcomes were wide. Subgroup analyses showed no statistically significant interaction between healthcare settings for either length of hospital stay (P for interaction = 0.79) or mortality (P for interaction = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: EFEF may shorten hospital stay and accelerate feeding-related milestones in clinically stable preterm infants. However, the certainty of evidence was low to very low, and estimates for serious adverse outcomes were imprecise. The current evidence therefore does not establish the safety of EFEF or determine whether its effects differ across healthcare settings.Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251251351.

Abstract as published, via PubMed.

View on PubMedFull text at the publisherOpen in the app

For healthcare professionals. The summary is generated by AI from the published abstract, and the evidence level is assigned automatically from the study design on the Oxford CEBM hierarchy. Neither is medical advice. Read the full paper before changing practice.